Hi Rick,
What you have experienced is what a lot of us have experienced. I, too, was all in at Dorico’s inception. I was a beta tester, and what I experienced was really alpha testing. (I tested for Finale and for Score.) Nothing worked on my computer to any extent that I could make a report. Eventually, I gave up, and didn’t consider Dorico until v. 3.5, which quickly became 4 and then 5. I didn’t key in my first piece until v. 5, not because I didn’t want to, but because I was still using Sibelius and Finale for publishers, and none of them were ready to switch to Dorico. (They still aren’t.) I’m even still using Score once or twice a year. (I am right now, actually.)
Lately, I have been composing in Sibelius and then reading musicXML into Dorico. Some pieces (not all) sound better in Dorico than Sibelius using the same sound sets, but my focus is the notation. I’ve become better at predicting how thing works better in the transfer, for example, giving every instrument its own line, and using the consolidation feature to combine them. That makes extracting parts much easier. I haven’t tried that with Finale, but you could create a workflow that you input into Finale and transfer it into Dorico. Just because they have stopped development, doesn’t mean you have to stop using it. I haven’t stopped using Score, and there hasn’t been any significant development in 20 years. (There was a Windows version that was pretty useless. Too many bugs.) It is still considered by many as the gold standard for music publishing.
My problem is that because I use whatever software a publisher wants, I need to know 4 sets of keystrokes, and 4 different workflows - and none of my publishers are using Dorico, so I can’t keep in shape on it, unless I’m composing. Everyone says you have to think differently when using Dorico - it’s a different philosophy. That may be the case, but I’ve worked using different philosophies before and didn’t have a problem. I know what I want, and I don’t yet always know how to get it in Dorico, and I’ve been using it for at least 2 years now. There are so many presets that you should be able to set things up right the first time, but that really takes sitting down and working methodically through settings until you get something worth saving. And, of course, different publishers want different things, so you have to do it for every house style you use.
I find Dorico’s menus convoluted with various settings for the same feature scattered all over the place. Yes, I know, Daniel, there is a logical place for each, but unless you are using Dorico all the time, one can’t remember which one has the setting you want.
Concerning your dotted notes, Rick, you can set some presets that will get you close to what you want, but I find that one preset will get almost what I want, and then setting another undoes it. I want 4/4 bars to split in 2, except when there is a dotted half note at the beginning of the bar, and I want my beams to group in beats. As soon as I drop in the splitting the bar in half, it undoes the dotted half notes.
I like to be able to drop hairpins and dynamics into the middle of long tied notes, but without jumping through hoops I can’t really do it. I’ve taken to putting dynamics in before putting ties, and that’s a backwards way to work. I don’t like putting hairpins leading to the first note of a bar that cross the barline, but I can’t seem to find a default that stops it short of the barline, so I always have to go back and edit it.
That said, Rick, I feel your pain. Even as a native English speaker, some of Dorico’s jargon throws me. It is, unfortunately, something that you have to learn with each program, just to find what you want in the help guide. If you don’t use the right term, you get nothing, and sometimes, even when you do use the right term, the search will find loads of irrelevant pages.
There are people here willing to help, and while some do seem condescending at times, we all work with the program at different levels, and there is likely to be someone out there that knows the right answer to your problem.
Apologies for the long, convoluted reply.