Anti AI

It doesn’t work this way.

Publishing is only one of the music rights. There are Mechanical Rights, Production Rights, Artist’s Rights. among others.

Other sources of income:

CDs, MP3 albums, Vynil, licences to potential external playback such as trailers and commercials, radio play, theatrical releases,ring tones, printed scores, usage of clips on YouTube, TikTok etc. Including usage of music as played by others on a piano, or other instruments, etc, etc, etc,…

Call me crazy, but it seems you want this to happen. I am trying my best to explain why the film-music industry is in a good place, and at no point, anything I mention is satisfactory, as the way you paint this, change is coming and there is nothing we can do about this.

Whatever I state is irrelevant, and in a few years (according to you) we, composers working in low to mid-tier films, will be out of work.

Not that I personally care to be frank. As I said, if it happens, it will be a sad day, but I will happily do something else.

I had a fulfilled career up to this point and, as sad as it will be, the “inevitable” will make it impossible to carry on, as understood from our discussions.

Oh well, I love those cranes that crush destroyed cars. Off to be retrained…

Huh? I’m not reading @MattiasNYC like that at all.

I deeply care. Making music is my life. If I can’t do that anymore, I don’t know what I’ll do.

OK, cool, this is the vibe I’m getting.

Same here, but, if change comes as some herald, how will you stop it?

Music won’t stop for me , I will still be creative, but not professionally.

I believe this is the association you are looking for (previously known as BASCA):

1 Like

That’s pretty cool, will check it out, cheers!

1 Like

It doesn’t work like that with AI? If nobody can copyright it they can’t profit from it, and since it’s not copyrighted how can its use be prevented?

Just because something is a certain way does not mean it will be a certain way*.

I asked you a not rhetorical question and it really does point out what I’m getting at:

"The movie with your music gets the same share of revenue from me as does the movie with AI music. The revenue stream to the owner of the movie/IP has not changed because of AI. For the movie that you scored there is now a slice that has to be taken out of what I pay that goes to you. For the movie that has AI music that is no longer true, but I still pay the same.

Where would that money go?"

If there is a law against using AI in a movie I would like to read it.

Hey man,

I’m bailing out of this thread. I am really bored with discussions about AI and how it will take our jobs.

I am a full time film music composer since 2010. Needless to say, I know what I am talking about.

I have tried to explain how things work, and why it is impossible for AI to take over film music composers. That’s my two cents.

I will unfollow this thread, I apologize in advance if I don’t answer anymore, I am not being disrespectful, I have nothing more to add to this chat.

Cheers.

Next time don’t bother engaging in conversation in the first place.

So am I, since 2006. And I still worry about AI taking some aspects of my job away from me. Things aren’t so black and white. Many people on this forum have many years of professional experience, and indeed know what they are talking about. Maybe not use your own experience as a reasoning to invalidate other perspectives and quite legitimate questions.

I am puzzled by the somewhat hostile tone in parts of this thread, when you maybe agree more than you think. :man_shrugging:

Peace :v: