Yes, the notation should match the Liber Usualis exactly.
There’s no playback, since this is actually a font, not “notes.” And unfortunately, the puncta cava (white to erase the staff line behind it) is not working, due to a Qt issue with export. But other than that, the font works beautifully.
I would be glad to hear your feedback on it. Thanks!
@dan_kreider
Thanks very much Dan. I’ll certainly let you know how I get on with it. It’s really good to have this font given that the demise of Finale may put Medieval2 in doubt - I have often thought about purchasing that but the price has seemed a tad steep and it just doesn’t compliment a mainly Dorico workflow.
Yes, but I’m talking about pre-computer. When did puncta cava start? If they were pre-computer, how were the staff lines erased? Or maybe they weren’t.
Im not saying it’s invalid, just trying to gauge how important it is, historically.
Historically every syllable had at least a punctum. These likely came in to play in the 19th c. when tables of formulæ were put into front matter. (But after 2 centuries, they are certainly commonplace now.)
Would you happen to know of any examples of this open note with an erased staff line that were made by hand? I’m still curious as to how it was achieved before GABC.
These engraved examples remind me: Notice the cava in every case is circular, rather than the shape of the outline. Some larger, some smaller, but always a circle.
This makes me think: Could this be accomplished – and block the staff line – with an overlaid white circle?