Comparison for Nerdle

Okay, so there will be several links here so I’ll try to organize and split it into sections it as best I can and try not to mumble too much :neutral_face: I saw on your site that you’ve done wedding photography for several years, I actually write wedding music and SoundCloud - Hear the world’s sounds is one of the only ones I’ve uploaded. The client specified the duration and Disney fairytale style.

Anyone, on with the comparison, I’ll try to keep it as short as possible. Edit; for the links you may want to right click and “open in new tab” because Steinberg didn’t see it useful to set that action as default.


We both have Cubase so no need to discuss that, it’s my choice for working with sample libraries anyway out of the few I’ve tried.

Two of the things that allowed me to even achieve professional sounding mixes were discovering how much difference a good reverb and using it correctly made and also how much difference mastering made to a good, balanced mix.

Now, this first comparison is just showing the difference in clarity of hearing instruments a good reverb used correctly makes. The difference is mainly noticeable anywhere after the break after the first section. You will notice the difference in more detail with a good pair of headphones at a decent volume.

Roomworks SE Reverb: SoundCloud - Hear the world’s sounds This uses just the one reverb over the entire orchestra (which is not how orchestra’s are recorded/mixed in reality) and I have the pre-delay, roomsize, mix dry:wet, and reverb times set exactly the same as when I use my reverb plugin of choice. But you can immediately hear in the busier sections how muddy it makes it sound.

QL Spaces Reverb: SoundCloud - Hear the world’s sounds This reverb costs more of course, but you can hear the kind of clarity and life it brings even to my rough mix so far. It allows me to use a small soundstage with little reverb like how real recordings are done to give it some life, but then add in a bigger sounding hall (using the South California hall where movie soundtracks are recorded) to give it a bigger hall sound. Oh and also, each section of the orchestra has a different pre-delay. This is important because otherwise it sounds like the orchestra is all sat directly on top of each other, which leads to muddy and unclear sounds due to the reverb sounding so cluttered. In a small studio room recording this doesn’t apply, but the soundstages/studio room reverbs are also very nice.

Sample Libraries

The quality of this makes a big difference to how good the instruments will sound, but like anything practice and experience using them will yield better results. I wouldn’t normally show the pieces below but it’s all I have to show the different kinds of samples. Bearing in mind, with Microsoft basic sounds there is barely any editing you can do to expression of the instruments. Edirol is just older technology and even if I’d used the CC data to get it as realistic as possible older technology simply can’t compete with the most expensive stuff. It’s just like trying to get a brand new game with state-of-the-art graphics to run on an elderly Pentium 1 :smiley:

Microsoft Synths: SoundCloud - Hear the world’s sounds

Edirol Orchestral (bit of an outdated library now): SoundCloud - Hear the world’s sounds

EWQL Hollywood Strings (just strings, rest are other libraries by EWQL company): - YouTube This was the very first piece I wrote when I bought this string library. So experience with getting used to the libraries is essential, but if you compare the sound of the strings from this to the wedding piece at the start of the post there is a big difference in the sound because I was more experienced when I wrote that. So practice of course matters, but you can only get as good a sound out of the libraries as the technology allows. I’m actually redoing this with better arranged strings, as well as production quality for more realistic sounding instruments for a animation album of production music.

EWQL Hollywood Strings, Hollywood Brass, Silk, Stormdrum 2, Voices of Passion: SoundCloud - Hear the world’s sounds Just to show a more recent piece, although I’m not using the optimal microphone positions for the best sound because my computer would die. With a more expensive computer the instruments could all sound more realistic because they are pretty demanding on resources and I can’t use enough expression without encountering problems. A new soundcard and solid state drives would allow me to load all instruments at maximum quality and expressiveness/realism though.

These products I’m using in the latest one are all on a -50% off deal atm, and if you buy 7 products at once in the ‘complete composers collection’ you get a huge price reduction too, like $1000 instead of paying $3000 that they’d cost if you bought them individually. They also have video tutorials explaining a bit about the products down the right hand side and how to use them so you have an idea of what it is you’re getting.

There are similar competing products for all the different instruments, so you’d need to hear music/demo tracks using them to decide which you like the sound of the most. But really, you get what you pay for.

If you want electronic sounds for dance stuff, I hope someone else can answer that well because I’d like some too :smiley:

I hope that gives a little insight into the sample libraries Nerdle.

Wow! First of all I really love your wedding tune - very girly for a bloke (strong feminine side)? Might have to pester you for advice and you clearly know much more than I do. Sedate and formal (v.short) for walkng up aisle - serene for signing register and celebratory for back down aisle - three moods - business idea?

I couldn’t get straight to sound cloud from your other links. Should I be doing something different?

Anyway - I will pass on pricey instruments just now as I believe the tune is where it’s at. When I’ve got a good tune I’ll ask someone like you to produce it for me - I’m just not techy. I think Barocky could be dancy though - I’ll see what I can do on my own - or can I bounce it off people on here???

Sequel is nice and simple and lots of samples to explore - just struggling to know which instruments go well together etc.

It would be great to observe a producer at work - I could learn a lot that way she said hoping you live 10 mins down the road and I get an invitation.

Hehe, thankyou. I write a variety of stuff from electronic to fantasy to Disney/animation. Disney music is my favourite out of everything that I love (just waiting to purchase the woodwind library to really get into it.) I particularly like Beauty and the Beast, Tangled and Aladdin :slight_smile: I also love music from romantic movies like The Notebook and those are genres I’ve always wrote in, the “epic” kinda fantasy stuff is something I’ve recently started doing.

Anyway, the links will work now. They are private and I forgot to include the extension on the link to enable access. They are not something I’d want to share publicly :blush:

Well, there isn’t exactly much boutique wedding music services out there, it’s not an easy genre to do well with feeling and not a genre that most people even want to do. As I said in your thread, I’m not academically educated in music so although I can write the notes down with pen and paper, I write by ear. Theory is an obstruction really, although wedding music is naturally confined to the happier sounding harmonic progressions anyway. My knowledge just comes from mostly practice, experimenting, discovery, reading a few things and aurally anaylzing music. I’m afraid I can’t discuss the wedding music business model ;p Except the first basic part is simply taking commissions from brides wanting specific music, whether it be specific instruments, duration or sound/atmosphere.

I practiced from around 17-18 (this was the very first time I attempted to write my own music) to 22-23 just by writing the score using a notation program that had very bad sounds (as heard in one of the pieces above) and getting Cubase and the cheaper sample libraries and learning the techy stuff was a very good decision prompted by my friend. At times can be tough and frustrating, but ultimately it’s satisfying and rewarding, if you have the time to put into it and enjoy I’d say go for it :slight_smile: I’m afraid I’d never collaborate with any composer or produce music for anyone, unless it were writing a musical ;D I can get my own orchestra compositions to a decent standard but aside from not wanting to produce for anyone, I don’t have that kind of knowledge to. The best thing is to just take it easy and enjoy writing the notes and experimenting with things yourself :smiley:

You’ll find some sounds that you like the sound of together, just keep writing and trying stuff out :wink: The piece you posted sound good anyway so you always have the option to buy the more realistic sounding libraries someday if you feel you want to take your music to new heights. Main thing is enjoying it, I enjoyed and was fascinated by those basic sounds in the first links for years. Once I discovered sample libraries however, my path up to the best sounding ones was pretty fast, I wanted more and more realism, and I still do which is why I am upgrading my computer a bit at a time :smiley: One of the things that having more realistic sounding instruments helped me with was orchestrating everything correctly for the correct parts of the orchestra. I think the different libraries can really change the way you think in terms of what instruments to use for what parts of your melodies/harmony.

I live in North England and I don’t think I’d want anyone observing me ;D I’ve taught electric virtuoso guitar before but I don’t think I’d be very good at giving Cubase/compositional lessons. Besides I’m not a producer despite doing the production on my own music. My Cubase knowledge is purely in using sample libraries. I can try to help with any queries about using samples or compositionally the best I can here though. I don’t usually come on here on weekends, this is just an odd one. Mid week is typically when I’m checking.