My system failed to install the 10.05.30 update: first time that it happen!
This is the message: āImpossible to open the XML C:\ProgramData\Steinberg\Audio Export Post Process Scripts\OpeninCubase105_64.aep, error system: -2147024786ā, then āCubase 10.5.30 installation failed. Irreversible error during installation. Error: 1603ā.
ā¦
Yet, it is still no longer possible (as in Cubase 10) to use the mouse wheel to change the current active audio event in the sample editor. Now you need at least two clicks per audio event when checking multiple vocals one after another (see screenshot).
Thereās some major issues here that are going to get abandoned in 10.5.3 that I donāt really feel is fair⦠and mind you, Iāve already paid for Cubase 11 which Iām not even using yet.
This is ridiculous. I posted this error months ago (without getting any answer, mind you), and it still is an error in that version. 2 bugfix-versions, thatās what you get. I been using Cubase since 1996, way to go, Steinberg.
Posting screenshots of the errors again. It happens when you leave Cubase open. All channel dialogues are also unusable.
That would be fine, if the release versions were properly beta tested and fixed before release, but the situation we have since a few major versions is very unsatisfying to say it nicely. Iām not a fan of yearly release cycles for the sake of it, this is a bad concept in video games and it is here as well. For example, if a bug was present in ⦠letās say Cubase 10, 10.5 and 11, and shares the exact same code to be fixed - why not backport the fix? No, older versions simply get left behind. Let them pay for the upgrade if they want bugfixes. If only newer versions would actually fix long existing bugs. No, some bugs get carried through several years without a fix and you can decide between being left behind with an outdated and no longer supported version, or a new one that introduces a whole lot more issues. Really great business here, Steinberg.
My thoughts exactly. Updates in Cubase have been disappointing since I have Cubase (version 9).
They add always new gimmicks and āmarketableā things, but they never fix or improve what they already have. They even break it more often than not!!! And they do nothing to fix it.
And then you see Presonus, which has released two free updates to their Studio One 5 and each one of these is equivalent to the update from 10.5 to 11.
Yearly updates are bad because:
They are focused on adding marketable things instead of improving their program.
They donāt update features unless itās a paid update, so the DAW remains at least one year āunchangedā for this reason.
Yearly updates in Dorico, on the other hand, have been great, because they have add relevant things to their program and they have also release .1 updates that improved or added features for free. Why Cubase team and Dorico team behave so differently?
One of them would be:
Gui glitching during temp to change.
at the very end of the song I have tempo going slower and slower and at this point at cubase GUI and response is glitching (freezing every few seconds)