Of course it’s viable.
It’s the only way to save cubase users, because every respectable proffessional user only dream of the way to completly left the computer world for dedicated hardware just because they do want to make music and nothing else, whithout the need to change something.
When somethings works, never change it! Music is intemporal, so is dedicated hardware! Cubase legacy would be a computer like didacted hardware, therefor viable for a stable in studio software investement! As the digital world in music is sloly dying, vst are replaced by hardware, so cubase interest lies in a good stable, and hardware flexible sequencer and perhaps due to it’s cost virtual audio path for vst effect till the users have bought a reel mixer and analog effect associated! Don’t invest money in low lifetime gears and software, but in intemporal ones if you can’t afford the graal (Real hardward)!
@steve
My mind is set for a couple of years, midiphy Seq 4 v+ with it’s matrix for fast realtime creativity + Cubase 7.5 XP it’s really a great sequencer for finishing tracks (make them written in the stone), and i love the sysex full integration at least on 7.5 also it should help me for some years till i get a full analog path which isn’t going to be easy because 12 8FX + 12 2 strip on the cubase audio rack. (but i should really get off my hand of digital audio processing as i 'm trying to do for audio listening which cut off/deform my analog synthetizers and use cubase what it was born for a digital midi hardware sequencer)
No good at all digital audio, square sinus are everywhere with this technology even with Motu’s raw 25Mghz oversampling input/output signal.
@ Giovanni_Buchelli
1000% with you, i would add make cubase free (free = make your music how you want on which hardware you want, no forcing to os upgrade)