Here’s a suggestion: if you want to be credible with people other than Apple fanbois like you, instead of just slandering Mr. Curigliano (who certainly knows computers much better than you) why don’t you do your own tests SCIENTIFICALLY (i.e. you post equipment and methodology down to the tiniest details) and then post them? You see, an Apple fanboi claiming that his PC’s malfunction all the time isn’t something terribly original to read on the internet. And then of course reasonable people would ask themselves why on earth would someone with such an emotional attachment to Apple ever use PC’s.
And BTW, what part of Steinberg claiming that the best system they tested Cubase on is an HP Z workstation did you not understand? Let me guess, Steinberg is also in the conspiracy to smear your beloved Apple? I bet that’s what you think.
You proved my original point about fanbois being emotional and in complete denial and making stuff up to support the unsupportable.
Are you blind? If you know just a little about statistics you would recognize that the referred benchmark just tells the result of the benchmark and that it is NOT applicable for other computers. (Too few computers tested. Too few configurations. What you see is all there is. NOT What you see is what you get).
I have also tried to hammer into your head that the question was for PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, not who could give reference to any benchmark test.
And you see to have missed the point that I currently use no less than 5 PCs and “only” two MACs. And you then conclude that I am a MAC “Fanboy”? And BTW I have been working with computers since 1976 and then I mean as a professional, not just a user, and conducted a lot of benchmarks over the years. Guess I´ve seen most of them in most configurations. So I also know “a little” (for you “a lot”) how much benchmarks can deviate from actual situations.
Agin - are you blind?