Cubase Vocoder

[scottswatzell]

regarding the folders on the ftp site…what is the best way to pull those down and use in C6?..its not real intuitive…thx, scott

[Elektrobolt]

@abstract_iv

Then they should be updated, not removed!!! We have paid for them when buying the old versions!!!

And you still have them, they just don’t work in the newer hosts.

[zephonic]

Some time ago, I posted a plea to not let the Tonic plug-in whither away:

Creativity First — Our Passion for Music Inspires

Ed Doll replied:

@EdDoll

Sorry, but we will have to let it die. We do not own the source code for that one and cannot deliver any updates anymore.
The same applies to Embracer and Monologue unfortunately.

I imagine the same would apply to many of the other discontinued plug-ins and instruments.

And yeah, I liked the bog-standard Cubase vocoder a whole lot, too.

[curteye]

@zephonic

Some time ago, I posted a plea to not let the Tonic plug-in whither away:

Creativity First — Our Passion for Music Inspires | Steinberg

Ed Doll replied:

@EdDoll

Sorry, but we will have to let it die. We do not own the source code for that one and cannot deliver any updates anymore.
The same applies to Embracer and Monologue unfortunately.

I imagine the same would apply to many of the other discontinued plug-ins and instruments.

And yeah, I liked the bog-standard Cubase vocoder a whole lot, too.

So sad
{‘-’}

[skank]

@curteye

@zephonic

Some time ago, I posted a plea to not let the Tonic plug-in whither away:

http://steinberg.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7688#p81059

Ed Doll replied:

@EdDoll

Sorry, but we will have to let it die. We do not own the source code for that one and cannot deliver any updates anymore.
The same applies to Embracer and Monologue unfortunately.

I imagine the same would apply to many of the other discontinued plug-ins and instruments.

And yeah, I liked the bog-standard Cubase vocoder a whole lot, too.

So sad
{‘-’}

+1

[folkfreak]

Build in foreign source code in the main products… yeah, very clever.

BTW as an excuse for not expanding funktionality (more insert slots for example) backwards compability is a most welcome excuse. Its seems when removing parts of the program backwards compability seems not so important.

[Romantique_Tp]

I don’t think you understand how programing works.