DOP processes multiplied and never end

I’m not sure what you’re asking me.

Based on how I work and how I see things there are two separate things to consider:

First is whether or not processing should be applied to all events that refer to the same clip your selected event(s) refer to. I can see the utility in both, and normally I just create new, i.e. I get processing applied only to what I have selected.

Second is whether or not we want “handles” outside of the current edit boundaries. The whole point of that seems to me to be that we’ll be able to adjust our edits after the fact. For dialog editing for example I can have a bunch of edit points between words and syllables, and if I select all of them and apply processing to them all I want to be able to adjust those edits later in case the timing feels off. Right now, in N13, for a lot of processes the 2000ms setting I have is not applied, which means shifting edit points sometimes gives me noise or clicks which I solve by selecting the processing, cutting it, and then pasting it back. I would of course not want the “handles” to be literally applied to the adjacent unselected event and be audible at the same time. Why? Because I didn’t select that event. Additionally I would have no control over where the processing begins in the adjacent event without adjusting the value manually (i.e. the amount of ms).

When I tried this today most often it did not look like what you see in the image, but I could get it to look like that maybe 10-15 times while testing. I just couldn’t figure out what the sequence of commands were that consistently would lead to that outcome.

Either way, it seems unpredictable to me, and therefore unusable.

Inconsistency is of course never good — this shouldn’t happen.

My point is: if you choose to process the whole file, you don’t need the extended range, as the whole range is processed anyway. The extended range could be discarded if you choose to process the whole file. The extended range is useful if you process into a new file.

I understand what you mean now. In my example I chose “new” every time.

OFFICIAL UPDATE

The issue has been reproduced and added to our list for future fixing.

Thank you Tajika for bringing it to our attention.

That’s great news, thanks for taking care of that longstanding bug.

When you fix that new bug please pay close attention to “Extend Process Range”. In my post above you can see how in some cases the extended range applies across the event boundaries into the adjacent event. This behavior is not consistent. It sometimes happens, sometimes not.

Also intermittent is the opening of the dialog for selecting “New Version” or applying to all events sharing the same clip. Sometimes this open, sometimes not.