Hi folks, I recently finished my first project on Dorico Elements, so here’s some feedback about the results. The finished product looks professional, and I’m generally pleased with the results. But there are some issues caused by the complete absence of Engrave mode, and I’m going to have to think carefully before I start another project in Dorico before I can afford Pro.
Two types of projects that you might expect entry-level notation apps to handle well would be song sheets (piano grand staff and vocal melody “sheet music”), and lead sheets, or “chord charts”. Here’s some problems that might arise:
-
Minimal ability to control the number of bars in a system, if desired. If a stage player receives a sheet that has almost everything on two pages and just a single system on page 3, you know that either the arranger is lazy, or the notation program is deficient. The arranger needs to have adequate tools to fix this scenario.
-
Chord symbols need to allow font changes. For a lead sheet, they’re often the most important thing - if you can’t customize the readability, then you can basically forget Dorico Elements for this type of project.
-
Chord symbols - you need the ability to place them in the middle of a grand staff.
-
Repeat endings/jumps/sections - also need some ability to change font size, at least. The Segno, whilst technically the same size as old-fashioned pop sheet music, is essentially useless for stage use. The player needs to be able to see it at a glance when sight-reading. In my project, I replaced “To Coda” with regular text, just so I could make it larger - this meant I had to dispense with the coda symbol at that point, which isn’t a good look.
-
Text needs more freedom in placement. 3 things I want to do are impossible:
-
Text underneath the stave. In a lead sheet, it’s often convenient to have chord symbols on top and some of the “explanatory” text underneath, to keep everything “tight”. There are many other scenarios.
-
Text to the left of the left-most note in a system.
-
Text in the top LH or RH corner of page 1. For example, if you’re producing several versions of a song for different instruments, then a label at the top is a good idea. Or, the name of the artist who commissioned the chart.
-
No Petaluma font, or ability to use anything but a traditional look, is another reason that Elements won’t be used for serious lead-sheet production.
-
The Project Info dialog has fields for many things, but only Title, Composer, Lyricist, and Copyright appear on page 1 in Elements. Subtitle would be very useful, and some others. As would the ability to have multiple lines for composer. What if there are 3 or 4 writers? The credit could extend most of the way across the page!
-
The ability to move the position of the composer credit up or down could be very useful.
Elements for me will be a stepping stone to Pro, as soon as budget allows. And that is the main reason for the existence of Elements, I know - to entice people upwards. But in order to achieve that aim, Elements must be sufficiently editable to allow people to use it in the first place, so that they then WANT to upgrade!
Thanks for your great work so far.
John.