Dear users and developers,
In this forum, I recently confronted some threads dealing with cautionary time signatures and key signatures. I also recently requested the system-attached comments and previously had asked for folder-structured flow concepts or subflows inside a flow.
The responses were diverse because these resonances are based on the type and kind of responders’ work and background.
In this thread, I would like to write the reason for the perspectives I consent to.
Let’s assume that we compose or notate a piece which includes multiple movements, and one movement of the piece is a variation on a theme. For example, we can find those constructions in Mozart’s A-major piano sonata in three movements, and its first movement is comprised of variations with a theme:
https://dme.mozarteum.at/DME/nma/nma_cont.php?vsep=197&gen=edition&l=1&p1=14
As one of Dorico users, I would like to make just three flows for this sonata, but the flow conception of current Dorico makes it difficult. The reason is complex:
- cautionary time signatures are usually not expected to be inserted between variations.
- cautionary key signatures are usually not expected to be inserted between variations.
- the title for each variation and theme, i.e. variation number and theme indication, might be inserted using system text. However, it is placed below the tempo assignment. So extra work is required.
- Between flows, before the first flow and after the last flow, one could put a report or instruction to the score. These are usually done using text frames. However, inserting new text frames, inserting new flows, or repositioning existing flows can change the order, so users should sometimes reorganise the pages of the Dorico project after that insertion or changes. To prevent this, using system-attached text is helpful, but the 0-line staff is officially not provided. I know a Dorico user offers a library. Even though using this third party needs to resolve the problem raised by cautionary key signatures and cautionary time signatures by covering them using thick lines and changing the colour to white.
- working on those big projects needs a comments feature, which is not only staff-attached but also system-attached.
What if one writes an opera score, a theory book, an exercise book for an instrument, or composes contemporary music free from traditional notation conventions? Without resolving the details mentioned above, the workflow could be very troublesome. This is why some users, including me, request changes and implementations.
Unless resolving these problems mentioned above, the flow conception of Dorico has some weaknesses. However, this is not an attack on developers. I will never be back to Finale because the basic workflow for inputting musical events and the printed output of Dorico is better. So instead, I want to request the features mentioned above.
Dorico is the most enjoyable software for making music I have ever used! Thanks to Dorico developers!
Sorry for my imperfect English, and thanks for reading!