FR: Global option for rests in secondary voices

Hi all! I’ve searched the forum and I couldn’t find this specific request, but my apologies if I missed anything. I am wondering if it might be possible to add an option to have rests in secondary voices ONLY appear within a specific BEAT, rather than across an entire measure, when notes in those voices are added. I’ve been working a lot with closed-score choral music (SA on one staff, TB on another), and my preference is to use a single voice on each staff when the music is homophonic, and only split to a secondary voice on a beat-by-beat basis when necessary. The current situation is certainly passable, but does require a lot of use of the Remove Rests command. It would be great to have a global option to say whether I want the second voice to fill in rests across the entire measure, or just for one beat at a time.

In a picture: I’d love to set an option to get this second measure by default, rather than the first:

You could apply the Remove Rests command just once to the whole piece, when you have finished your note input.

Unless I’m much mistaken, using the Remove Rests command on an entire flow also deletes regular rests in the primary voices, so unfortunately that isn’t a viable solution here.

Hi @apratt31, here another approach using the voice filter, before applying remove rests:

Also: if unwanted rests are removed, you can just select the note just before or after the rest (depending on the case) and deactivate the start-voice and/or end-voice property, undoing so the removed rest.


That said, this kind of things are automatically done/manageable using condensing. But condensing is not jet fully compatible with voice+lyrics instruments.

Some literature here (to help sleep) :

The mystery of the rests finally solved by Secret Services

1 Like

Yes–what I’d like to see is an additional option in the “Rests in Additional Voices” section of Notation Options that specifies whether I want implicit rests to fill an entire bar, or only up to a single beat where there is multiple voice content.

Thank you to those who are offering workarounds–this isn’t a question of “how do I get this result,” but rather a feature suggestion to make getting there automatic. :slight_smile: