Why? I can’t see why it is do offensive. I don’t even notice it. Then again I’m not doing a load of other things while working on projects. I do thrm on another computer.
There is a tendency for modern Windows software to ignore Windows built-in windowing and menu systems. Developers think they can do better and waste half their time re-inventing the wheel.
Cubase, DaVinci, Corel’s Painter and PaintShop Pro, and also Kontakt and IKM stuff with their ramshackle menus, &tc, &tc.
If I remember correctly, Cubase’s windowing system was a response to user requests, around the time of V7.
That’s what makes it so worrying.
My computer isn’t used exclusively for Cubase. Try working with multiple windows open and switching / alternating between them. If that’s as specified then something is seriously wrong with the specifications.
Considering the mess that is Windows UI SDKs today and the fact that even Microsoft is completely inconsistent in their use of their own SDKs, that’s not really surprising unfortunately.
I hated it and was always critical about it but now,
it actually works for me as I use a multi desktop environment.
It allows me to open windows on other desktops so one doesn’t have to drag and drop and align etc… as the bar goes across the desktops.
Outboard channels on 1 mon, arranger on the next and mixers as needed.
I’m worried if they change it now that it’ll kill this workflow for anyone that uses it similarly.
Another annoying thing is imho when opening 2 projects simutlaneously. The first project window gets somehow smaller and shifts in position, while the second one will be displayed fullscreen. Why would I want that?
Just for my own curiosity: Do you have an example of a Windows software that, like Cubase, runs multiple windows “inside” its application? I’d like to have a look. Dialog boxes, though technically windows, don’t apply of course.
MS Office used to be such a software but they changed their window management a long time ago.
So Cubase has never responded to this?
Specially for a software company with all this years I’m afraid they have millions of lines of code
I don’t know if they’ll ever do it
Unlikely. Steinberg’s disposition, as I understand it, is that this is a user forum for users.
On occasion a staff member will pop in and post in the Cubase forum but I’ve never seen one where they would confirm or deny an upcoming feature or change.