I have asked a similar question in the past, but I still find this very difficult. How can I fake out these graces? The MS section is split across two systems, so it is a little hard to read, but I hope it can be understood.
I can work out the first part using a tuplet ratio of 4:1-5, bit I can’t figure out
the ratio for the 3x32 space inside the 9:8 for the next part.
Sorry, but I cannot read this MS at all. Could you post a screenshot of what you have in Dorico so far, or as much as you can already do, and then explain what’s missing?
Now I got it out of the vocal “player” to eliminate the out-of-range-notes distraction (and besides, I doubt even Bethany Beardslee could have quite handled that one!), added the lower part (which I could only figure out how to enter as 7:4x, as opposed to the stretched 7:8 32nds you have), and put parentheses (or should I say “rounded brackets”…) around the rest in the second version using staff text. Any good…?
@Andro, I kept thinking about and playing with this notational challenge you posed after I initially posted, realizing that I didn’t fully address the across-the-measure issue.
enter in the new voice the same nested 5:4x and 3:2x tuplets filled with rests, but…
when I passed the second sixteenth note under the nested 3:2x, I entered four eighths as grace notes, followed by a sixteenth rest
I used Edit > Remove Rests to hide most of the second voice’s rests
I hid the second voice’s tuplets and final (sixteenth) rest by setting their color to 0% Opacity under the color property
finally, I did a bunch of manual note and beam dragging in Engrave Mode
What I could not figure out how to do was get the eight grace notes grouped under one beam spanning the barline. I leave that to others with greater skill. But I hope this approximation is at least helpful!
And…one more idea (I’m gettin’ all ‘pit bull’ on this one…!):
This time I:
placed the caret at the second sixteenth note under the nested 3:2x, then entered in the downstem voice a thirty-second note 8:5 tuplet (which I hid by engaging Number in the Properties Panel
selected the eight (soon-to-be) grace notes and set the (triple) Beaming > Thickness to 0 spaces. [Engrave Mode]
created a custom thick horizontal line with the Lines Tool for the faux-eighth note “beam” [Write Mode], then lengthened and positioned it as necessary [Engrave]
added a thin vertical line to be the grace-note slash [Write] and tilted and positioned in [Engrave]
The nice thing about this approach is that it obviated the need for 0% opacity anything. I just had to Edit > Remove Rests for all but the parenthesized dotted sixteenth rest in (my) m. 6. (Parentheses added as staff text; positioned in Engrave.)
I also elected to flip some of the stem directions from your manuscript, thinking that it would be a bit clearer visually.