Would this help?
I am stuck with generating this vst3presets…
I opened up for example Massive I have from Komplete but the presets on the top of the Cubase window are all ‘’ and I can’t convert them because of duplicated name (what is not surprising due to name for all the presets…).
How do I convert my presets to use them in the media bay???
Any idea please?
- This sucks Yes it really does…- I would expect some more user friendly way…
- How?? - I wanted to convert but what to do with those "disabled’? - they are not representing any real preset in the vst synth and I really don’t know how to do it…
Thanks but this doesn’t help much as I need a presets for a full Komplete 8 and where is much more presets than in time when the thred was posted
Due to the above mentioned I find Media Bay completely useless. I have built my own “mediabay” first in excel then in File Maker. In File Maker I can set up any parameter I would like to use as search filter. CB Steinberg does not even come close when it comes to filtering and that is essential in large environments. Otherwise you just get a super long list that you have to scroll through. If you have Komplete I guess your environment is pretty big. So my advice is: Build your own in a separate database or use the computers filesystem where you name files and folders after your preferences.
I was really looking forward using the media bay so I will finnaly get rid of browsing vst’s to find the right sound but this fact makes it quite castrated…
There really should be a Batch convert utility (windows and mac !) to convert every type of vsti preset into .vst3 preset.
…moreover when VST is in fact a Steinberg’s stuff…
Anything you can do with your excell file maker system you can do in Mediabay. Plus there’s things that Mediabay can do that your system can’t, like link playback of midi loops to the chord track so you can preview your midi loops by making them play the chords from your chord track.
I don’t understand what your problem is… are you complaining that its too much work to convert all your Komplete presets or do you still not understand how to convert them to Cubase’s vstpresets?
In fact both
- I don’t know how to do it (what exactly needs to be done and what to do with those ‘disabled’)?
- I want to make music and not spend days with converting presets (there are thousands of presets in Komplete 8) so I can fully use them just because the implementation is not ideal and someone didn’t finished a good idea (like a batch cover and naming or whatever)…
If you are correct, I would suggest requesting the feature. Moaning gets us nowhere!
Really? I’m pretty sure its explained in the manual, but ok let me break it down for you…
1- Go to the browser on Massive, or FM8, or Razor, etc… and double click on a preset to load it. Just to be clear, I’m talking about the browser that comes with Massive, FM8, Reaktor, etc… not Cubase’s vstpreset browser.
2- Once the preset is loaded go to the top of the GUI of Massive, FM8, Reaktor, or whatever plugin you’re using and go to the vstpreset section and click the box to the right of where it says “disabled” and then click “save preset”.
3- Type in the name, rate it, tag it in its proper “category/sub category” (ex: “bass” - “synth bass”), tag its “character” (ex: fast attack, distorted, mono)
This should be enough for you now. Later you can go in Mediabay and add your own custom tags to your vstpresets.
I spent countless hours saving, categorizing, and tagging my presets and I gotta say the time spent was totally worth it. The convenience of having pretty much any sound you can think of in your head just a quick search (a few letters in the search bar) away is absolutely priceless in my experience! Yes its a LOT of work, but once your presets are all categorized, and tagged with your own unique custom searchable tags and you experience the night n day difference/improvement to your workflow you will wonder how you ever lived without it!
To quote Conman:
“As any professional tradesman (electrician, painter, plasterer etc.) will tell you it’s all in the preparation. Decide what you need to prepare then prepare it and it saves LOADS of work down the line. And that includes categorisation like any lawyer, financier or accountant does if they need long detailed lists to analyse and access is to collate them in a readily accessible form. Only the users will know what they want to categorise which is why software like Cubase leaves wide gaps open whereby you can do this so you understand it and not wait for the software to paint you into a corner where you don’t want to be.”
I got your point but honestly I don’t see a point in spending so much time on doing something that is already done - the presets are already tagged, named etc. and its only a problem of cubase that is not able to handle it. Iam not lazy but I cannot afford (and partially don’t want to) to spend so much time on doing it… :-/
VST is kinda standard which was made by Steinberg so I don’t see any excuse for not pulling any informations from the plugins. Frankly saying, I spent enough money for the software and I thing it should be able to do such a simple thing like generating and handling some xml-ish files.
They are categorized by some random dude at Native Instruments and not by you. Your opinion on what preset should be in what category will many times be different than what native-instruments-preset-organizer-guy thinks.
You can’t listen and compare a mono distorted bass synth preset from Massive next to a mono distorted bass synth preset from FM8 next to a mono distorted bass synth preset from Sylenth like you can in Mediabay.
You can’t tag presets in Native Instrument synths using their native presets with your own custom searchable keywords/tags like you can in Mediabay.
Cubase “can’t handle it” because Native Instruments (and Spectrasonic, Fab Filter, etc…) use their own type of presets. It would be nice if every single plugin used the exact same presets but unfortunately thats not reality…
Again, I know its a LOT of work but like I said, once your presets are all categorized, and tagged with your own unique custom searchable tags and you experience the night n day difference/improvement to your workflow you will wonder how you ever lived without it!
But “VST” really has nothing to do with how 3rd party plugins developers set up their preset systems.
completly agree with the post above from “Stealth” ! yes it’s a hard/long work but when it’s done the mediabay is so powerfull more than you can imagine !
A long thought:
I realize everyone works differently. The concept of going through every single preset and doing it yourself isn’t attractive. But, after working with synths since the late 70’s and being swept up in newer VSTI marketing/technologies I would like to suggest that batch import might not be necessary…and it might even be beneficial if you actually tag each preset.
In the late 90s I spent literally hundreds of hours tagging synth patches one-by-one for MOTU Unisyn. I built up a very large library and everything was good until MOTU decided one day to discontinue Unisyn. So, today I still have a Windows 98 pc in my studio running Unisyn for the sole purpose of editing and categorizing synth patches for my many outboard rack synthesizers. Without Unisyn, many of those synths would be close to worthless due to the lousy user interfaces of the 90’s. Examples would be products from Emu or even an Oberheim Matrix 1000.
With VSTI’s the concept of hundreds…even a thousand presets in one synth isn’t uncommon. But is that necessary to get the job done, or just a distraction? Native Instruments answer for this was Kore, then Kore2 which is no longer supported. Kore also allowed any 3rd party non-NI VSTI to be batch imported and then tagged. Kore was much more than a librarian and editor and so powerful and flexible I think NI had a difficult time marketing it. So with Kore I have 32,500 patches, about 6,000 of them tagged by NI and maybe 100 tagged by myself. I believe there is a 70,000 patch limit. But how does that really help make music?
Most people I’m around seem to have 100-300 “bread n butter” patches that they are very familiar with and know how to implement in their production. If not, they take one of those patches and edit it a bit. This seems to be very different than the NI Kore concept of searching through thousands of NI created and tagged patches.
I realize Steinbergs Media bay is much more than just synth patches. I use it all the time for loops. But one has to stop and ask how much time do you want to invest maintaining/creating a media bay system vs. writing/producing? Especially when Media bay has the limitations and issues it has? Every system for me has ultimately been ineffective if I spend too much time with it. Motu dumped Unisyn due to VSTI’s becoming more popular than hardware synths. Soundquest/midiquest is expensive and has many bugs. NI dumped Kore because they knew they would have to devote “too many resources to it” when they could simply use 10% of the Kore concepts and put them in Maschine to make a fast buck and satisfy a much larger demand.
So how much time do you really want to spend with Media Bay, a system that isn’t really designed for 3rd party developers? And how long will Media Bay be around before it’s morphed or completely abandoned for something better?
Back to work!
For me I sort of split the difference and scroll through sounds making a “best of” list tagged. There are many sounds in a library that don’t appeal to me, so it is worth narrowing it down to the best for me, rating them in tiers, 3, 4, or 5 stars, which become searchable, and by instrument, category, genre, etc,. Yes it is still time consuming, but you become familiar with your library in the process and in the end it is time spent that can pay off. 2 cents