I never bought vst 2 plugins ,but exchanged my philosophy with vst 2 plugins,so i almost own 90 percent of well known comercial vst 2 plugins thanks to socialist developers who value wisdom.Steinberg,what i want to say is that u dont have argument to say that “Mister smelly Philosopher”,it was your mistake that u fed up us and made us capitalist who owns vst 2 as intelectual property and use it for weakining new daws at the expense of killing people rights who formed our intelectual property bying vst 2 plugins.So if customers bying your vst 2 plugins formed your intelectual property which was based on comercial principles ,it means that u own nothing privately,but own something collectively because the exsistence of comercial intelectual property depends on customer purchases .So why u dont respect (collective) yourself?
Your post makes very little sense. I guess it is a translation into English. Anyway, VST3 was introduced in 2008. I cut off all VST2 plugins at Cubase 10, I think (2018?).
Which VST2 plugins are you dealing with that you cannot live without?
If they “valued wisdom” they’d’ve switched to VST3 long ago.
Why on Earth would you do this? You didn’t own a single product based on a defunct standard, and then thought it would be a good idea to buy a whole heap of them? And then start complaining about it?
That’s easy for you to say.
Setting aside all the gibberish, the issue seems to be that certain DAWs no longer support VST2 plugins (Spoiler: Cubase still does!). If the criticism is that Steinberg developed VST3 and discontinued VST2, that’s a ridiculous complaint. On the contrary, Steinberg held on to VST2 for many years, even after VST3 was published. Anyone who still mourns the loss of VST2 plugins for which there is no VST3 version is hopelessly stuck in the past.
Cubase does. I still use a couple of VST 2 plugins that i can’t seem to replicate.
Hi,Your post makes very big sense because there is no senseless thing in this world because everything serves,even venom of snake ,dust serves… because there is relationship between creator and creature,creator creates one thing it to serve him.Your question “Which VST2 plugins are you dealing with that you cannot live without?” should be directed to all people because i defend peoples’s rights not my need.U just tell me why u dont allow people to enable vst 2 for their daws and to defend peoples rights?
Dude,i am going to enable vst 2 support for magda daw because people deserve it,
it’s not up to you to decide which daws people to use for their vst 2 plugins,sold your vst plugins just stay away,dont interfere!
But it would be gentle movement by u to do it yourself just sending message to developer of magda daw that u can use vst 2 for your daws because if developer of magda daw will not do it,i will do it myself,but in this case u will lose your reputation.Let me know if u sent him positive message or not
Maybe you should direct your ire towards the developers of this software. Cubase still allows VST2.
It’s hard to tell with whom you are angry.
I directed the question to you because I was genuinely interested. I thought, perhaps that someone might be able to suggest a VST3 equivalent/replacement.
After further reading, I wish I had not tried to help.
“magda daw”!?! Oh, dear. Don’t worry, I won’t “interfere” anymore 
.
