Hello. I’d like to record two tracks of my electric guitar simultaneously: one track with a dry DI sound; and another track with a full mic’d up amp sound. I have a Steinberg UR44C sound module and Cubase 11.
If I use a split Y-cable with my guitar and plug one end into my Cubase via the UR44C (for the dry DI sound) and the other end of the Y-cable into a mic’d up amp (for the full, live, loud sound), would that theoretically achieve my aim?
The reason I’d like to have an exact dry DI copy of the guitar track is so I could maybe use an amp modeler to blend with the real live amp.
It should but it may lack in power due to splitting. If you gave enough inputs and outputs record dry and also send out to the amp cab. A bit like an external instrument.
Thank you Mr. Wilde! I’ve ordered a Y-cable and currently waiting for it to arrive. I thought I’d get some feedback while waiting to “suck it and see”.
Thanks for the reply. But if my Steinberg UR44C has 2 HI-Z/Mic inputs, and 2 Line/Mic inputs (and all inputs have option of Phantom power), how essential is a separate DI box? It feels like an unnecessary purchase, especially as the dry signal will by normalized, compressed and run through a digital amp modeler. What could a DI box do that I can’t do with a combination of my UR44C and Cubase 11? Cheers.
The sound resulting from the Y-cable will be horrible. Test it and you will hear for yourself. If you have an effect pedal with two outputs, as mentioned by @plectrumboy, that might be a viable solution, too. But a DI box is the standard and the most transparent option for your needs.
I didn’t want to throw a huge amount of cash at a DI box considering it’s my first use of one. I’ve gone for the Behringer ULTRA-DI DI100 which has got good reviews. Hopefully that will be decent. Thanks again for everyone’s feedback, much appreciated.