Thanks guys for the response. Please don’t get me wrong. I have great love for Cubase going back many years. I’m just frustrated that some of the other DAW’s are beginning got lure me away with their features. I want to stay with Cubase, but it’s costing me time to do certain things and my ProTools and Ableton friends are working faster on their DAW’s. So, I was venting at this.
Lovegames, it is a reasonable request to ask for specific examples. In the heat of the moment, I was frustrated that I had to keeping going back and forth between the mixer and the edit window for some tasks, and I discovered that I would not have to do that in ProTools. Also, the ability to edit parameters on the waveform is extremely helpful in Ableton Live. Cubase’s version of this is weak. We should be able to edit all parameters right on the waveform. This would save a lot of time. Also, if NASA want to produce a hit song, they would use Ableton Live. If they wanted to write Beethoven’s 10th Symphony, they would use Cubase. If they wanted to mix Beethoven’s 10th Symphony, or five rock albums in one week, they would use ProTools. So yes, I am aware that every DAW has their strengths and weaknesses, but I want to produce a hit songs right now and that used to be Cubase’s strength. They are currently being outgunned on production workflow.
Raino, you are so right, ha ha! It would actually take a lot of R&D, and engineering for Yamaha/Cubase to make the next leap. But taking risks at the right moment is what life is about.
Drdrdrdr is with me on the automation lanes over waveforms thing! If they only make one improvement, this should be it.
Dylanmixer, Yes, compared to everything else, Cubase is advanced, and clunky. But it gets the job done, and we are all happy for that! There is a lot to celebrate. But, does it need to be so clunky? I can imagine it differently, why can’t Yamaha/Cubase? They seem strangely uninterested. And so here we are, talking to each other in a forum instead of making music. A DAW should inspire music creation, but Cubase’s latests versions are inspiring me to visit the forums.
Also Dynmixer, Yes, I like my DAW’s to look good. And, yes, I like them to perform like a great sports car. Am I asking too much? Nah, form and function are the hallmarks of inspiration. Cubase is in fourth place on this front. I’m not measuring sales, I’m measuring ability, and speed is a factor. As a hobbyist, Cubase is great, wouldn’t change a thing, great to explore all Saturday and play. But I’m trying to turn pro, and I need to do a lot, and I need to do it faster. Cubase is getting in my way. Thus, the complaint.