Music symbols & texts as line annotations don't have the same options for vertical attachment

my objective is to create a custom line that shows gradual transition between playing techniques, in this case sul tasto (s.t.) to sul ponticello (s.p.):

Screen Shot 2026-02-20 at 13.46.23 PM

how did I do it:

create custom line annotations. for the start cap I just create an item in the text category of the line annotation editor:

for aesthetic reasons I chose half x height as vertical attachment point.

for the end cap I want to have an arrow combined with the other playing technique, sul ponticello. Unfortunately you can’t add texts to the category “arrowhead” in the annotation editor and can’t add arrowheads in the text category of the editor, so the only way I saw was to create a custom music symbol showing an arrowhead followed by the text item “s.p.”:

And as you already see: for vertical attachment you can choose top, center, bottom or baseline, but not half x height, as I chose earlier on the s.t. text, which leads to the result that I can’t find a way to make both text and music symbol appear on the same x height without just manually playing for each item:

Is it in any way possible to attach a music symbol by its half x height?

Thanks for your attention and help.

Just select both the st and the sp, right-click->Playing Techniques->Group Playing Techniques.

Jesper

1 Like

In my case they are not playing techniques, but user-defined texts/music symbols.

I don’t understand. Did you try? You can change the transision line if you prefer. Or change it in Engrave mode.

Jesper

1 Like

Ah, you want a line, like this?

Jesper

1 Like

Wait? That’s possible? Okay, that’s a whole other are of the program I didn’t even consider because I started my process of thought from the lines menu and not the playing technique menu.

I used text here instead of music symbol.

Jesper

1 Like

I just wanted to create custom lines I can save in the lines menu to have the shortest possible input way for these technique transitions, so that I only need to select the line in the menu and don’t have to do anything else

But how did you get the arrow to appear? Because if I select a text as the end cap of the line the arrow suddenly disappears.

Hang on, and I’ll send you an example.

Jesper

1 Like

Not perfect, I’m afraid. I added st and >sp as repeatable symbols. I still think grouped playing techniques is a better option.

Jesper

st-sp.dorico (539.1 KB)

As I see in your screenshot, I’m afraid this option has the same vertical alignment issue?

how did you get the arrowhead to appear here when you have selected “ord)”as a text end cap of the line though? or is this one repeatable symbols too?

The arrow head is part of the symbol. Yes there is an alignment problem.

Jesper

1 Like

Ah okay, bummers.

The playing techniques grouping is an option I didn’t know about, so thanks for that. It will work I think, but still more steps for the input than a custom line.

And the main issue still is that there seems to be no option to align music symbols by their half x height, which could also be an issue with other things than playing techniques, in which case this workaround would not work.

So that’s why I’d like to ask the Dorico team if there is anything that speaks against a “half x height” vertical attachment option not only for text, but for music symbols as well

Yes, I’d like more options, too. You can create a key command for group playing techniques. It’s rather fast.

Jesper

1 Like

Here’s a better option.

Jesper

stsp.dorico (537.5 KB)

3 Likes

thanks for your efforts, but yeah, I think we won’t get a perfect version:

if you drag the line into a new system it kind of bugs

Oops, bummer.

Jesper

1 Like

How about the custom line in this Dorico project?
st to sp.dorico (1.2 MB)

In the line annotation named s.p. destination, I added a space character as a third item after the arrowhead and the s.p. text, and adjusted the Y-offsets of the text and the space character until the horizontal line was centered on the arrowhead and the baselines of s.t. and s.p. were essentially the same.

3 Likes