Existing users can update from your user area.
There is some discussion in their forum. Various videos on YouTube already. Documentation in the Pianoteq 9 folder after installing.
I have not had time to evaluate it yet 
Have fun!
3 Likes
Iāve always found the quality of pt piano sounds a bit lacking. No matter how you try to improve them, they just donāt quite sound natural. But, the Rhodes, Harp, and Guitar sounds are absolutely amazing!
1 Like
Iāve thought that many of the piano presets are quite realistic, but I agree about the classical guitars in particular. Those are really surprisingly good.
My GoTo Piano. For years I stuck with a modified version of the Steinway D Classical option but for the last 12 months Iāve switched to the Steinway Pop option as it is. Iām just coming to the end of a large collection of Folk Tunes arranged for Piano and Iāve used that setting throughout. Love it.
1 Like
I found Pianoteq 8 which I own clearly their best to date. But it still doesnāt rival a decent sampled piano (like my VSL ones) for beauty or naturalness of tone so I rarely use it these days. It may be that sampled instruments will be replaced by AI in the not too distant future but modelled ones still have quite a long way to go in my view.
I use Pianoteq for basic stuff and Keyscape for recordings. In my opinion itās the absolute best.
1 Like
I played V8 and V9 side by side and really think V9 is MUCH better sounding. In fact I only used Pianoteq 8 in the past for everything I do. But after playing V9 I found V8 flat and unrealistic 
. Iām such a simple guy 
2 Likes
Have you tried V9? Surprisingly one of the things I like the most is hardly advertised: the thunder pedal. The only thing it does is adding a few more dynamic layers louder than ff
VSL Fazioli F308 (full version) and VI labs Modern D just leave Pianoteq in the dust if you ask me (please donātš)
1 Like
precisely - thatās now my favourite piano.
Pianoteq 9 does seem a little less tinny and with more depth. I donāt know if I can be bothered to fork out the ā¬29 upgrade as for most things I prefer other pianos (in fact, despite its limitations, the Etude Elements does very nicely for one particular work of mine).
1 Like
Iām not a trained mixing engineer. But even my untrained ear hears a bit only subtle difference between both versions. And adding more āvelocity layersā via the thunder pedal makes a huge difference too. I highly encourage everyone to try the demo.
btw I still hear, that sampled pianos sound more realistic. But I have not found one that I like to play as much as Pianoteq.
2 Likes
Pianoteq has always been very playable and generally well behavedā which is one reason I got it in the first place (even though Iām not really a pianist myself) but for listening to renderings of my own music at any rate, I nearly always find a sampled piano which simply has more character.
1 Like
The piano sounds aside, I ran v8 and v9 in immediate succession, and on my system (Apogee Element 46 audio I/O, Focal satellites and sub) the noise floor was much lower in v9. A nice change.
4 Likes
I just made the free upgrade since I bought Pianoteq 8 last November. Iād been on the fence for years and finally bought it, and am glad I did. I had been using the pretty nice Radical Piano rack extension in Reason, which is pretty realistic, but Pianoteq is definitely better. I redid a lot of my prior audio files using a Bƶsendorfer, and those things are on Bandcamp and sound quite good. On the other hand, I generally silence the key up and pedal noises, since they just donāt sound realistic to me in Pianoteq (they were much better in Reason, but also sometimes distracting if I didnāt tone them down). I only just downloaded v9 of Pianoteq but will be curious to compare them. I just flew home from a concert in Brussels that had a piano work of mine on the program and to my ears, a ārealā piano will always trump sampling or modeling. But the differences are sometimes marginal at best if the modeling is really good.
3 Likes