Did somebody forgot to mention that
Thank you!
Did somebody forgot to mention that
Thank you!
Dare I suggest that the ânext actionâ would be better defined at song level? Some of us run 2 or 3 songs together.
We could also use a ânext actionâ at part level, possibly with a count in - the drum solo may overrunâŚ
Not quite sure what you mean. We added âPrevious Songâ and âNext Songâ actions with the next version, hope that helps. If you want to target a specific Song, use âSelect Songâ.
I mean that we might play the opener, chat to the audience and then play 3 without a break. So if, at the song level, we can set Stop for the first and Play Next for the next 2, and Stop for the 3rd we donât even have to look at VL during the 3 song marathon.
It also follows that some songs may have Parts where we actually want VL to stop, and then continue on command, hence the example of the drum solo. The possible need for a count in at that point lets us account for any timing drift during the stop.
This could be achieved by making 2 or more songs too cover the breaks but could make re-ordering the set problematic.
I hope that makes sense.
I assume âSelect Songâ is in the next version.
Select Song is available in actions, but it just means you can select a specific Song (number) with a MIDI input control.
I see your point. We plan much more on that level, but for a first step it might be useful to define the Song End action per Song.
Absolutely
Thank you
Select Song is available already in Devices/Actions. You can select a specific Song with a specific MIDI control message. If you need a lot of that, youâd have to have a lot of buttons, though
LOL
I wonât need that if we have End action per song.
coming next update.