You can record straight from any summing bus, as long as you’ re not creting a feedback loop. This guy has also done it that way. Mor info as always can be found in the manual.
I lost the video unfortunately, just something I had in mind (
Oh btw… in this video:
In the link above, he says he’s making 2 new groups in Cubase - one for TI 2 IN and one for TI 2 OUT, then he’s sending the TI 2 to a new group to handle the reverb and stuff like that. I don’t get this routing? why is he doing this?
And also I’m wondering why he’s using F11 (the VST instruments window inside of Cubase) instead of just loading it inside of each instrumenttrack?
He routed it to any kind of summing bus, which can be a group, an FX track, or an output. Since currently that´s the only way to record internally in Cubase, he has done it exactly that way.
Unless he used a soundcard mixer to do it.
Getting back to this thread. I found the video and watched it over again, and guess what! He didn’t route it.
He simply just Disabled ANY outgoing sound of that Audio channel and then selected the input as the Stereo Out (output). That way he records everything that comes from the master.
And to get sound out of the master you need to route the signals there sooner or later, or in case of the master - automatically. Nevertheless, the master out is the summing bus, where the audio that has to be recorded is routed to.
Exactly. This spares ALOT of routing and such of the channels and can be used as a RECORDING audio channel which is awsome. Then you just add a new normal audio channel and move that file down to that channel and voila you have sound again.
This way you don’t have to change any inputs what so ever - works the best for me atleast