Well when you start with something as superficially obvious as “it is exactly what you saved it to be” one has to wonder if you actually mean that, because it is so obvious, or if you meant something else. Yes, whatever you save something as is what you save it as. Great. We got that out of the way.
However, the next statement “and you know precisely what it will be” is clearly wrong. People don’t know “precisely what it will be”, if they did we wouldn’t be here. Pro Tools users clearly have a different experience altogether, right?
So taking those two statements together I just had to ask if you understood the broader context.
Quite frankly I’m not sure what you’re trying to argue in this thread. Everyone gets that the system is what it is, “most people” seem to understand that the system as it is right now is counter-intuitive at the very least, and people are here arguing for a change to the system.
We hear you loud and clear, you don’t think it’s a bug. You think it should be a feature-request instead, we hear you, and here are my requests: Automation system, VCAs, Eucon - Features Request
If this thread bothers you why not start a new thread with “feature-request” as a tag and maybe that will get traction and this thread can die and nobody will think of this as a bug? Everybody wins, right?