msy
June 27, 2011, 11:29am
1
I did a mastering test of a song in Cubase and sent to the co-producer for approval. The song has a -11dB RMS avarage in Cubase. According to him Wavelab shows -8dB RMS avarage and not -11. How come??
It this a bug or does different audio analyzers have different measuring methods to detect RMS avarage?
And… which one is right? (I’m guessing Cubase here because Voxengo SPAN also shows -11dB).
The file has 16-bit dithering applied to it.
Hello,
Please notice that you have much more RMS measuring settings/options. It looks that he has a different setting somewhere.
Cheers,
Chris
Split
June 27, 2011, 11:43am
3
Well I hope it’s -11 as -8 would be a bit on the hot side.
RMS detection should all give the same results, someone did question wavelabs peak/rms detection here> Resolution and zoom - Cubase - Steinberg Forums
Are you looking at the average RMS and not max or min ?
msy
June 28, 2011, 7:06am
4
Thanks for the replies!
Chris: Ah ok, I’ll ask him to check any settings. Must be it. I also did a test with Audacity and it also shows -11 dB avarage…
Split: Yea, -8 avarage is way too hot, even though many records are squeezed like that today
msy:
I did a mastering test of a song in Cubase and sent to the co-producer for approval. The song has a -11dB RMS avarage in Cubase. According to him Wavelab shows -8dB RMS avarage and not -11. How come??
It this a bug or does different audio analyzers have different measuring methods to detect RMS avarage?
And… which one is right? (I’m guessing Cubase here because Voxengo SPAN also shows -11dB).
The file has 16-bit dithering applied to it.
There is AES-17 option available in Wavelab.
If checked, calculated RMS will be 3db hotter (instead -11 you’ll get -8dB).
Zabukowski