I believe there was so much work and effort spent by web designers into making http://museum.steinberg.net/ , unfortunately i couldn’t stand trying to navigate/browse that flash website for more than 3 minutes and closed the page. 
That FLASH … just ruins the very interesting “true content and information” that Museum website has, and it is a shame.
Yeah, I love Flash, but that site is a navigational embarrassment. Like placing a green elephant in the hallway because in India elephants are really a great companion to humans … 
The navigational concept just doesn’t work. It has to be transparent and add to the experience, or else the visitors will just get web fatigue. Modern internetians have a very short attention span.
I should point out that the stuff inside the Museum is a lot of fun, especially the interview snippets with Charlie & Manfred! 
I actually like the museum design. Doesn’t look like anything else.
yeahl, looks ok, but the navigation you have to physically wrestle with to get around is just … too much?
Agreed. It’s real turn off. First rule of design IMO is ‘form follows function’ and not vice versa
Aw. I think you guys are being a bit mean. 
I’d agree if it were a reference site for fast access to important information but this is just a bit of fun for casual browsing. And like so many old museums it’s housed in an arcane labrynth of corridors and levels with surprising half-hidden rooms just waiting to be stumbled upon - but equally quite happy if they’re not.
It doesn’t surprise me – stienberg.net overall is a bit of navigational zoo… IMO. For example, the tool for reassigning a license is buried deep within the site, actually in the knowledge base… where nobody will find it.
The museum is kind a cute but I agree that form should follow function at least nominally and this design is just a bit too arbitrary
L like much of the content in the museum but agree that navigating through it is a dealbreaker.
I had some fun with some of the stuff I found in the “museum”, but to be quite honest, I’d prefer if Steinberg had devoted the resources to bug fixes.
I agree, It’s just a bit of fun, to be browsed when having a smoke and a pancake 
Now… if they could make the knowledge base more friendly that would be a step forward.
… thus explaining your sig "
". Is that a typo in your name? 
Yeah but it’s not fun. That’s the point, it should be fun. 
yeah, it’s a bit like a cross between a cupboard with lots of drawers, the kids card game Memory and picking your nose with a sharp and pointy tool. 
But it’'s also kinda fun and original for a while, so we have to give them that?
What happened to the years after 1998, though? That’s more interesting than the mid 90ies?