As I understand it, what the reviewer did was use the Suno AI Platform to enter some text description (stylistic prompts/desires) and some lyrics and then presses the button to get Suno to generate a song, given that set of input. He regenerated the results around 9 more times, each producing a stereo file variation using the same prompts. One of which he found appealing (to his taste/judgement/sensibilities).
He then chose to download this stereo file AND used the platforms latest offering of full stem separation files too (performed on that same stereo file, I’m presuming…).
Then he did his analysis on this stereo file and the zip download of the stems produced, in Cubase. He included a comparison with SLP’s attempts at stem separation of the same stereo file.
Hope that helps.
Correct on both counts.
You say ‘extremely limited’… Well, for me it’s still a perfectly valid ‘Unmix Song’ task for SLP to undertake - can’t be selective in choosing what’s thrown at it, surely.? Yes, SLP is a lot, a LOT more than that - but within the confines of the comparison experiment, the reviewer stated in his opinion SLP is one of the best at what it does (for other products to stand up against).
Yes, there may be something in that… 