Tacet question

Hello everyone, I posted this question already in the German forum but it is bit urgent, so sorry for the doubling.
Does anyone have an idea why tac

et is not notated from bar 69 onwards but much later? Unfortunately I can’t explain it. Many thanks for help

It is the presence of the bar 97 time signature.

Enable signposts to figure out if there is something which breaks multi-bar rests.

1 Like

In the German forum we figured out he probably isn’t talking about tacet markings but multibar rests, as there are no tacet markings.
But it’s unclear so far if he wants a tacet marking or a multibar rest.

Anyhow, also in the English forum we need either the project or signposts, @gogollny :wink:

Sorry, we can close this here an d go back to the German forum ,thank you all !!

@gogollny can you please post your solution here, too?
Or the link to your other forum contribution/Forum Beitrag?

The bar rests in from Bar 69 to the multibar rest were entered explicitly (so not Dorico’s automatic implicit bar rests).

Here’s the link to the german thread:

1 Like

thank you Sascha.

1 Like