Thanks, Fredo, and by the way this seems to be a mixer-screenshot from a screen with a more standard pixel-resolution…?
My screens are 1920 x 1080.
The mixer wasn’t fullscreen in that screenshot though.
The mixer “sizes” in good quality to any size of screen. So there are no “fixed” dimentions anymore.
You can make each aspect as big or small of you want, without loss of “resolution”.
Meaning that you can customize, save and recall, the mixer to your specific needs.
It takes a while to get used to it, and as with every change it feels a bit strange.
But as soon as you get over the fact that we are all old and grumpy farts, who don’t want anything we like to be changed, the mixer is a real improvement. Flexibility is the keyword here.
Could you give a real-world example of how one would benefit from this? I’m just trying to wrap my head around some of the priorities made by SB and I’m just curious how this is an important new feature compared to other functionality.
To name an extreme, so you het the picture.
When working on a laptop, you cna now have a (mixer) fader row on the bottom of your screen.
Or a meter row, or the insert/send row …
A big view of the Channel strip^with small faders, or the other way around.
You can “design” the mixer exactly to your needs.
Ok. Well to me this seems convenient but pales in comparison to VCA’s and the ability to correctly import an .aaf so you actually have something to use the resizable mixer feature on in the first place.
VCAs are planned it was said, so lets drop that for now.
Groups/Links is what Fredo showed in the screenshot. Can’t we discuss that instead?
As for the .aaf I agree with you. It should just work.
Groups/Links actually is quite good. You have colors numbers, you can link most parameters and it works.
You also have “adhoc” linking, which makes the need for VCA a little less needed, but still needed.
Give it a chance maybe?
It’s been requested and planned for a while I think. Like I said, strange priorities. My thread so I don’t think I need to “drop that for now”.
Ok. It’s better. Like others I’m still not sure why they simply didn’t adapt PT’s way of doing it.
Sure, I most certainly will, and it’s an improvement. I wish they could have included labeling though. Seems odd to me though that they’d leave out labeling of the groups. In PT, as has been pointed out, part of the issue is control, i.e. being able to control several tracks by actively just controlling one. The other part has to do with organization. So if you want to make focus on a group by making it alone visible for example then in PT it’s easier because you can use the name of the group or use the VCA to get that done. If I understand this new updated linking I would, in a large project, have to identify and look at a track part of the group that I wish to see in the mixer for example, or have to remember which number corresponds to which set of channels. Simple naming would have solved at least that problem, wouldn’t you agree?
FWIW, for my purposes the resizable mixer, at least in concept, is a humongous positive development. I’ve been wanting this sort of thing for a (long+long)X time.
Not going to go off the deep end about it without some practical experience, but really look forward to improved window management in general. That (and the grace period update ) were major reasons for moving forward to N6.
Other enhancements, even if now only on paper, are more than “just gravy”, either. I use Nx for so many different things-- post sound, composing, audiobook recording and editing and more-- the versatility is key to my being able to get things done.
And yes, here’s to getting some of those missing fundamentals that linger from long-ago versions finally taken care of.
Don’t know if you have noticed, but the new mixer was (also) needed for complementing the new hardware. Which was another one of those long time must have requests.
I’m sure that if everyone could “design” his/her own DAW, they all would be very different. What is a priority for you might be a total waste of time for someone else, and vice versa. In other words, you will always find something to complain about. It will never be perfect. Let’s have some respect for features that benefits others. Although I agree with you that AAF must be fixed ASAP, I do not agree that this update without VCA.s is a total waste. The new linking features come very close to VCA’s and will fulfill the needs of most users. There will always be something that is crucially missing. I predict that, as soon as we have VCA.s, it will pale in comparison to the need of playlists and session import data.
This is a very good point. I stand corrected.
Well, I never said it’s a total waste without VCAs, so kindly stop implying I said things I never said.
As for AAF files however any Nuendo version without proper .aaf import is by definition close to useless unless one uses an application outside of it to get the media inside somehow. This is just plain logic. Market as a post app, post guys use .aafs to get media, Nuendo doesn’t import .aafs, Nuendo doesn’t have the media, nothing to work on - literally.
But no, I didn’t say it was “a total waste” without VCAs.
I actually agree with you that many people most certainly would prioritize playlists and session import data over further VCA functionality. So my point was broader than just these two examples.
Again, I stand corrected on the resizing of the mixer view. You made a good point. And I do think it looks like a fantastic upgrade overall, in case I didn’t make that clear in any thread, and, business permitting, this upgrade is a no-brainer for me.
Now, while you’re here: If I install a version after 5.1 where can I find the “AAFFilter component folder from Nuendo 5.1” on Win 7 x64? I’d like to try using it instead.
5.1 and 5.5 are separate installs, they both have their own folder, and you can fire up any of the two whenever you want. So, you can import the AAF in any of the two versions that work. ( remember that it depeqnds from which Mediacomposer the AAF’s come from) The AAF folder is located in the Components folder of each Nuendo version, Hich you can find in the Steinberg folder in Program Files. So -if you really want to have the 5.1AAF filer intso 5.5, just swap the AAF folder. I am pretty sure it works. But the most simple way is just to fire up the Nuendo version you need.
100% no it does not work in the mac version!
Big question for me on linked parameters…do we finally get parameters linked in the arrange page as well as the mix page? The way it works in PT for instance…Can we insert automation on the arrange page via mouse and keyboard and have the same automation reflected in the linked track? At the moment …the only way to insert the same data on to multiple linked channels is to move the faders. personally…i rarely use the mix page. Anyone know if this has been addressed?
No, this hasn’t been addressed.
Ugh! Thanks for the reply. How frustrating!
Wait; how do you know it hasn’t? Have they made that clear?
That’s a shame. It’s one of the (very) few reasons that Pro Tools is still my DAW of choice for mixing.
It is a shame! This is one thing that still seems really “semi pro”!
Perhaps we should ask the officials about it?