What is "noteheadXBlackQuarter"?

[teacue]

In the “Edit Notehead Sets” editor there is a Category “Crosses”.
In both Sub Categories “X and Circle Noteheads” and “X and Diamond Noteheads” one can find a notehead with the name noteheadXBlackQuarter.

I can’t find this glyphname either in the smufl-browser or in the SMuFL specification: Please wait while you are redirected
What is the unicode for this glyph?

Could it be that this is falsely labelled ind Dorico and it is simply U+E0A9 - noteheadXBlack ?

Edit
I am also unable to find these two other noteheads:
“noteheadDiamondMinimaWhite”
“noteheadSlashDiamondWhiteWholeOversized”

[dspreadbury]

noteheadXBlackQuarter is indeed U+E0A9. noteheadDiamondMinimaWhite is U+E93C. noteheadSlashDiamondWhiteWholeOversized is U+F4E7.

[teacue]

Thanks a lot Daniel.

[RichardShigeta]

I was just about to start a thread with exactly the same title when I found this one! The existance of noteheadXBlackQuarter is a bit of a problem when designing SMuFL-compatible fonts.
The value of glyphWithAnchors for noteheadXBlack (U+E0A9) in the JSON metadata is reflected correctly in the X Notehead Notehead Set.

In the X and Diamond Noteheads Notehead Set, however, the value of glyphWithAnchors is not reflected, perhaps because noteheadXBlackQuarter is assigned instead of noteheadXBlack.

This could be some kind of mistake, since there is no need to distinguish between noteheadXBlack and noteheadXBlackQuarter, not in SMuFL.

[RichardShigeta]

Similar problems occur with mensuralNoteheadMinimaWhite (U+E93C) used in White Diamond Hoteheads Notehead Set. If JSON metadata has glyphWithAnchors for it, it is ignored.

Perhaps this is because Dorico calls it noteheadDiamondMinimaWhite instead of mensuralNoteheadMinimaWhite, which @teacue said.
@dspreadbury, could you please look into this? I’m sorry if I should have created another thread.