Look forward to seeing the new-multi touch components incorporated into Dorico 4, as I suspect they would well on my touch-enabled Windows laptop.
Trying to count āoffice-based desktopsā in any meaningful way is going to be a hard problem. For example I worked at a company where thousands of engineers used āWord and Outlookā every day. None of them had a āWindows desktop PCā actually on their desk. Most of them had powerful workstations with $10,000+ price tags running Linux, not what most people would describe as a āPCā (and certainly not running dual-boot operating systems, or Wine emulation, or whatever).
The minority of managers and others who didnāt do technical work had desktop boxes that only needed to be powerful enough to run a keyboard and a monitor - you probably couldnāt even install a full modern version of Windows or MacOS on them, let along run any apps.
There were huge economies of scale in this set-up. A āpower userā might only need the āpowerā for 10% of their working time, so why pay to give them their own desktop PC that is only needed for say 4 hours a week and does almost nothing for the other 164 hours?
All the Windows usage was via software from companies like Citrix, which provides ādesktop-as-a-serviceā access to any device anywhere. Word and Office were actually running on Windows servers, and not necessarily even in the same country as the person using them, considering that many projects teams were international and the last thing you want is multiple copies of āthe same fileā in an uncontrolled manner on multiple usersā personal machines, in a project team with more than 1000 employees!
Concepts like ācloud storageā have been around for decades. The thing that is relatively new is that companies are now marketing them to individuals, not just to large organizations.
2 Likes
Donāt forget that Dorico is not only aimed at professionals (where MacOS surely could be dominant) but also to people new to the field. Those folks are a much more inhomogeneous group. They might be IT guys running Linux or gamers running Windows.
My most beloved games donāt run on MacOS at all, so even if I could switch my day job to MacOS I will still be staying on Windows 
for this read āone or two specialist applicationsā. Itās nothing to do with ācreativesā (whatever thatās supposed to mean) but simply due to the fact that thereās more software I want/need which runs only on PC than the other way round. On the other hand, for my relatively little used iPhone and iPad, I much prefer the Apple iOS system to Android having tried both. Iām not sure if you can buy completely silent and fanless Macs either whereas I finally can enjoy listening to music in peace and quiet on my PC.
2 Likes
nice! Only about 4x what I paid for my PC 
Actually, there are lots of Macs that are fanless, not just the ones that cost more than my car. The lowest cost Mac notebook is also fanless, and several reviewers of the new M1 Mac Mini and Macbook Pro thought their units were defective because the fans were so quiet they couldnāt be heard.
2 Likes
Pretty sure the Mac Pro has fans.
1 Like
Yes but theyāre dern quiet. Or so Iām told.
I have a pair of Noctua fans in my custom build. Incredibly quietā¦
1 Like
Thatās true! We have them in the recording studios on campus. They are dead silent.
The āApple taxā on that is really insane! Itās definitely beautiful in appearance but hereās a comparison to a high end PC build (more or less specāed to the one I just did in July, although I already had several of the components and sold off others)
PC
Ryzen 5950x (16-core) - $849
64GB DDR4 RAM 4000MHz - $339
MSI RTX 3080 - $1,119
4TB (2x2TB) Samsung 980 m2 PCIe4 - $799
4TB SanDisk SSD - $469
Fractal Define 7 Compact - $99
Gigabyte Titan Ridge Thunderbolt - $89
Gigabyte X570S AERO G - $349
Corsair iCue H100i Elite - $149
Corsair RM850x - $149
Razer Deathadder Elite - $49
Das Keyboard 4 - $169
Total: $4,628
Mac Pro
Intel Xeon W-3245 (16-core)
48GB DDR4 RAM 2933MHz
Radeon Pro W5700x (15,021)
8TB SSD
Stainless Steel case w/feet
Thunderbolt included
Mobo chipset?
Additional cooling not needed
Power included (1280w)
Magic Mouse 2
Magic Keyboard w/Keypad
Total: $11,499
The PC build costs only 40% of the Mac, has a faster CPU (46,134 vs 30,246 on PassMark CPU Benchmark), has a faster GPU (24,404 vs 15,021 on PassMark GPU Benchmark), has faster PCIe 4 vs PCIe 3 on the Mac, has both more and faster RAM, etc. Iām sure they will sell them to studios, but they are really crazy expensive compared to PCs.
The Mac Pros are very āspecific specificationā hardware. The equivalent HP Z-series is more expensive.
Xeons are workstation/server-grade CPUs, and support Error-correcting Memory, address more RAM, and have all sorts of other spec not in ānormalā desktop CPUs. In some environments, they are critical.
I agree, itās not the Mac that most people need. But Apple did a ton of research after the 2013 trashcan, and thatās where the market is. People - Businesses - arenāt paying an extra $5,000 just to be cool.
1 Like
On the music side of things, every NYC recording studio (that isnāt a 1-man operation) that Iāve been in uses these high-end Macs to run Pro Tools. Obviously reliability is key factor for them, and many of them have mics and other hardware that cost more than that so itās not a particularly large expense. For home studios though I personally just donāt see the point in spending 2.5 times the cost for slower hardware. I like Macs, and we have 4 of them in the house, Iām just on PC for my desktop because of the above crazy expense.
I concur (not regarding NYC as Iāve never visited!). Every studio I know in the UK is wedded to Pro Tools and hence Mac. Similarly every design agency here used to run Claris Works.
I can find no evidence that Macs are any more or less reliable than PCs.
Sorry, Fred. Do you not see the irony here? You appear willing to pay over the odds for 4 basic machines to surf the net and handle emailsā¦
(As a total aside, Doricoās use of frames reminds me of Lotus Manuscript - an early MS-Dos desktop publishing suiteā¦)
1 Like
Oh, I do! Both kids got MacBooks when they graduated middle school so they would have a computer to last them through high school, and they wanted Macs. Wife also is on Mac. We have an old Mac Mini that the kids used when they were younger that now is only to āsurf the net and handle emails.ā Iām the outlier in the house, LOL!
1 Like
I have a Mac Mini, which copes effortlessly with everything I can throw at it. Using the Dorico benchmark scores:
Fredās Ryzen: 3857 ms / 3649 ms
My Mini: 4038 / 3760 ms
Itās a 6-core i5 3Ghz and I paid around Ā£1,100 for it. The āApple Taxā myth is over-stated. Appleās laptops are not dissimilar in price to similarly specced HPs, Dells or other high-end laptops.
Yes, some people use Apple because they need Pro Tools or Final Cut Pro, and are thus somewhat wedded to it. Others, because theyāre familiar with Unix and have years of scripts and automations in their workflows. Others, because they grew up with them.
I first started using Macs in the late 80s, when no one had an IBM PC in their house. I learnt Unix on the Sun workstations at Uni, and so when OS X came along, it was the union of two old friends. I also worked in publishing, where everything was Mac. Iāve use Windows about 12 times, and am completely lost when I have to!
I remember being criticized for ātrying to be differentā. Now, Iām just one of the unthinking sheeple who goes along with the crowd. 
3 Likes
This is what I learned from this thread. Mac users are here in the majority. Windows is reserved to The Happy Few!
Iām quite happy with my macs, lol.