Working with Soloists and Divisi in Choir

(While there is some overlap here with another post [Divisi soloist appears in wrong place], it also has some issues that weren’t covered in the previous post.)

I’m writing a piece for SATB choir in open score, and I’d like the member of a section (in this case, a soprano) to sing a solo. Specifically, I’d like the solo staff to appear only when it has music in it—I’d like it to appear and disappear mid-staff if necessary, perhaps with an indication to join the section at the end of the solo. My instinct was to create a new instrument (a Solo Soprano) in setup mode, but that didn’t achieve what I was looking for, so I tried the Change Divisi function, which opened up a whole other set of challenges.

First, as previously posted, while it seems to create a solo staff above the section staff, it actually creates a section staff below the soloist. This would make logical sense if the section itself were divided, in which case the top staff would be the principal staff, but it’s the opposite of how a soloist works, where the main music is on the bottom staff. It became more confusing for me when I tried to Restore Unison: any music that I had written in the section staff disappeared at the unison, and I was forced to write any music I wanted in the solo staff, which is the opposite of what I was expecting. Again, this would make sense if the section were dividing, but it’s the inverse of how a soloist in a section works.

Switching to Galley View shows that the section staff disappears at the tutti, leaving the soloist visible and creating a large gap between (in this case) the soprano soloist and the alto section, making working in Galley View unwieldy. At the same time, this is almost what I want to happen, but it’s backwards: I want the section staff to be visible at all times, but the solo staff to disappear when it doesn’t have any music. Is there a way to reverse this, or to specify that the solo staff is invisible when empty? In Layout Options, there’s a tickbox to “show extra staves across full system when starting or stopping” (it’s currently not checked), but checking or unchecking it does not seem to affect the score.

To my mind, it would make sense for divisi and solo staves to work in different ways from each other—either that, or it could be specified which staff represents the principal music. For a solo staff to override the section isn’t just confusing—it’s backwards. And if there isn’t a way to hide the solo staff when it’s empty, I think that would be a feature worth adding.

My friend, this precise thing has been bothering me from the moment the divisi function was introduced. That was version 2.0, close to seven years ago. Not only is it conceptually misguided, it also makes assigning different patches for playback a big hassle, and makes some things impossible to notate without resorting to ‘un-Doricoish’ workarounds. You haven’t missed a checkbox somewhere.

2 Likes

You can hide any staff using the Layout Options or with Manual Staff Visibility, but that will affect an entire system.

If you really want a Solo Staff to rise up in the middle of a system, then you could use an Ossia. (Or use a Single Player – as you’re not using Divisi – and Add a Staff. )

2 Likes

Using a single player was what I tried the first time, but I couldn’t figure out how to hide it when I wanted to. Any suggestions?

You make the Chorus the Single Player, and add a staff above it when you want the Soloist.

Sorry, I mean that I couldn’t figure out how to hide the solo part when I wanted to. Here’s an example of what I mean.

I’m a fairly recent convert to Dorico, and part of why I made the switch is because it lets me think like a composer first and an engraver second. The use of players and the way it does instrument changes is a perfect example: it lets me think about the music rather than how it will look on the page. But this strikes me as an example of the opposite: it has the concept backwards, so I’m forced to worry about the engraving rather than focusing on the music. I only hope it’s improved upon in a forthcoming update.

1 Like