In Dorico, the dynamic markings duplicated vertically at the same place are synchronised (or linked. I am not sure which expression is better in this case) in
- their alphabets,
- their starting position and ending position as well as
- the placement (above/below staff)
I find the synchronisation of No. 1 and No. 2 are reasonable and very convenient.
However, the synchronisation of No. 3 often interrupts the working process because the dynamic markings on the stave with lyrics are vertically placed in the opposite side than the staves without lyrics:
A. We should isolate the dynamic marks on the vocal staves from the dynamic mark on the instrumental staves.
B. We should repeatedly change No. 2 on lyric staves after changing No. 2 of the dynamic marks on the instrumental staves.
How do you think about this behaviour of Dorico?
Methought, it would be practical if Dorico does not synchronise No. 3.