Hello !
Don’t know if it’s an issue or an unwanted (or absurd) modification of a feature :
For the track delay value, click+drag / mouse wheel are less precise (0.1 ms instead of 0.01 ms) than in previous Cubase versions. It’s inadequate and insuffisicient, especially when looking to solve a phase issue between microphones…
Hi,
This is a known and already reported issue. Thank you.
Still there in 13.0.30 
Still there in 13.0.40
Just a question: Can you alter by 0.01ms if you hold down the Shift key while moving the mouse?
Nope…
Can you still set value(s) manually (via double-click) and do these stick after you press Enter.? I know its not the point and not what you want.
Hi,
Of course, you can.
Yes, that’s the way I use it for now, with a kind of dichotomy approach…
It was so much easier before Pro 13
Still there in 13.0.41
(just a hotfix… I know, I know)
Still there in 13.0.50 
Still there in 14.0.5
Still there in 14.0.10
Extrememly frustrating that two years later they still havn’t done anything about it!
Now in Cubase 14 not only is this an issue, you can’t even adjust via the keyboard anymore (only the mouse). Absurd!!
No, I’ve tried literally eveything I can think of to adjust by 0.01ms. Really impacts on my workflow when trying to precicely align two tracks until they phase with each other. I spend forever typing in numeric values 
Still there in 14.0.20… 
Still there in 14.0.30…
Still there in 14.0.40… 2 years already ! 
Je parle en français parce que manifestement chez Steinberg tout le monde s’en tape de ce post remonté régulièrement depuis 2 ans maintenant :
J’ai évidemment acheté la v15 parce que je suis addict à Cubase depuis 2001 et que je ne peux pas lâcher ce logiciel du jour au lendemain avec les quelques milliers de projets clients accumulés en 24 ans. Malgré tout, ils sont incroyables chez Steinberg : ils te font des updates, rajoutent des bugs, ne les corrigent pas et continuent à faire des nouvelles versions sur nouvelles versions en mode fuite en avant. Bien sûr ils corrigent des trucs “critiques” rapidement quand nous sommes suffisamment nombreux à aboyer. Mais bon sang pourquoi ne pas corriger tout aussi rapidement des bugs RAJOUTÉS de version en version ? Ils cassent le workflow et la patience de leurs utilisateurs les plus fidèles en faisant ça.
Un bug qui semble nécessiter une correction ULTRA-SIMPLE à mettre en oeuvre (l’exemple ici : revenir à un pas de 0.01 au lieu de 0.1) est ignoré depuis 2 versions et 2 ans !
Je ne conseille même plus Cubase à mes étudiants tellement c’est devenu une usine à gaz qui veut tout autant viser les newbies que les pros. Non mais j’ai pouffé quand j’ai vu le petit didacticiel du Hub afficher “Cliquez sur “créer un projet vide” pour créer un projet vide”. Sérieux…
Hi,
Since this is an English-language forum, we would appreciate it if you could please add an English translation to your posts to benefit users and search engine results.
DeepL or Google Translate do a great job and only takes a few seconds
Thank you!
Translation of the original message:
I’m speaking French because obviously no one at Steinberg cares about this post, which has been reposted regularly for two years now:
I obviously bought v15 because I’ve been addicted to Cubase since 2001 and I can’t just abandon this software overnight with the thousands of client projects I’ve accumulated over 24 years. Despite everything, the folks at Steinberg are incredible: they give you updates, add bugs, don’t fix them, and continue to release new versions on top of new versions in a headlong rush. Of course, they fix “critical” issues quickly when enough of us complain. But why on earth don’t they fix the bugs they ADD from version to version just as quickly? They’re breaking the workflow and the patience of their most loyal users by doing this.
A bug that seems to require an ULTRA-SIMPLE fix (the example here: reverting to a step size of 0.01 instead of 0.1) has been ignored for two versions and two years!
I don’t even recommend Cubase to my students anymore because it has become such a complicated mess that aims to target newbies as much as pros. No, but I laughed when I saw the little Hub tutorial displaying “Click on ‘create an empty project’ to create an empty project.” Seriously…
