Hello,
I make use of the vertical stacking of inner staff labels and center the instrument names vertically. I find myself using the “distance between outer or group label and systemic barline” engraving setting to prevent instrument names like “Trombone” from moving too close to the player numerals in certain cases where it is between staves. For instance, here:
The “Tbn.” would be awfully close to the numeral “2” without using this setting to push it to the left, and in some cases might be colliding with it.
This setting works great with the brass, as you can see there. However I discovered it has an unwanted side effect with string divisi when choosing not to label the individual divisi staves with names:
In this case, the cellos divide at one part and I chose, as I believe is entirely customary, not to label the two individual cello staves. The issue here is that the Vc. div. staff label is shifted over to the left as though inner staff labels were present - in this case, they are not present, so it is shifting over to make room for something that isn’t there, which looks a little bit weird. In cases where there is a solo and gli altri staff then it can make sense to have those names for the individual divisions, but for simple divisi, it is customary to simply have the centered Vc. div. staff label.
At the moment I’ve had to slightly restrict what I wanted to set the “Distance between outer or group staff label and systemic barline” as a value lower than I wanted just so that the cellos don’t look stupid in those divided systems by the label being too far away for no good reason. Could this option be modified so that in cases where the inner labels are not present, it distances the label as if it were an inner staff label? Or is there any way of doing this right now?
As a secondary request, it would also be nice to be able to have some control over the vertical spacing/distance between inner staff labels. In some cases with condensing and larger numbers of instruments you can have things like this happening:
I already brought that up in a previous thread, but it was confirmed there was no good way of handling that, so I would like to request a feature there.
Thanks!