This is a bump from a post from many years ago concerning glissando text. I’m currently in a similar position to the below thread where a lack of independence of the “gliss” text and the gliss line is creating collisions in my notation. I know I could work around this by eliminating the “gliss” text and potentially adding my own separate text to position independently. Gliss is central to my work and is in practically every measure, making it cumbersome.
Small use case for sure versus other likely important things, but if an overhaul of how gliss notation is handled is at all in the works for future, consider more flexibilty of the text positioning independent of the line position. If nothing else, an “above” and “below” toggle would be better than nothing.
Here is a little example using the horizontal line (an invisible line) with line anotation .
Note that it is important that the lines are note-attached.
If you never need the glissando text you can use regular glissando lines and set engraving options to just show the line. Or just turn it off on a case to case basis. And yes a custom line can be saved as default with the star icon.
this is what I did for now. but since the line are so powerful why even bother with the ‘normal’ glissando ?? why just not build a custom library of lines that I need ? and can use. can you keep them for another project ? and can you call them with a shortcut ? script… ?
Well, remember that for Dorico the semantic is very important, so using the appropriate tool (ornaments) the Gliss will also playback accordingly, and for many users that may be more important that the notation/grafic representation.