picture a pimply 17 year old, with no talent and a bunch of broken gear imitating a rocker. Then realizing he could jump around at bars for beer money.
ah!
Split:1.0329978488239059262599702099395e+148
That’s 95 ! (96 times less.) Just pointing it out before you start start testing the first 1.0329978488239059262599702099395e+148 permutations only to find you’ve still got 96 times as many again to get through.
Split:Give that duck a loaf of bread
Yes please.
Oops…
9.9167793487094968920957140154189e+149 so my windows calc says
Here.
HowlingUlf
let’s not talk signal to noise ratio here
How about just signal? Will a puny guitar output survive the journey with them all bypassed? I think there would have to be some relay stations…
And all of it feeding into a lone Fender SuperReverb amp (4x10)
(with the ‘tilt-back’ legs).
Well at least the input seems to be going into the ‘dry’ channel.
{‘-’}
you can’t use that thing anyway, unless you are good at tap danicing in a mine field AND playing the guitar simultaneously. Some one did it for laughs!
Where is my Sherlock award?
You need this remote control unit…
Nice find, looks like it’s the same board
You need this remote control unit…
That’s outstanding (no pun intended)!
Who wants to tile their studio floor with Boss Pedals?
NorthWood MediaWorks:You need this remote control unit…
That’s outstanding (no pun intended)!
Who wants to tile their studio floor with Boss Pedals?
Well, you do have to feed the kid I suppose, but at least he’s no longer in diapers! Just pack him into the road cases after the gig.
Guys … guys … c’mon … the point IS NOT to turn all of them on a once! If you were cooking a dish, you wouldn’t dump ALL of the spices from the spice rack into the pot at once, would you? Of course not! The object is to use the spice (or combination of spices) needed for a particular recipe. Thus, the better equipped your spice rack, the broader palette of dishes you can prepare. Same goes for pedalboards. A typical nights worth of bar-band gigging of popular songs may have 96 effects scattered throughout. If you are serious about putting forth the best and most authentic performance, it is essential to have ALL those pedals on your board. Naturally, it should go without saying that one needs to carry a back-up pedalboard of equal proportion to every gig in case something fails on the main board.
Here’s Swamptone, carrying his pedals into the next gig…
… at least he’s no longer in diapers!
If he were it would be Nappy You Hear.
Split:1.0329978488239059262599702099395e+148
That’s 95 ! (96 times less.) Just pointing it out before you start start testing the first 1.0329978488239059262599702099395e+148 permutations only to find you’ve still got 96 times as many again to get through.
2^96 = 79228162514264337593543950336 possible combinations…
2^96 = 79228162514264337593543950336 possible combinations…
That’s different. That figure is the highest number you can represent with 96 binary digits. 2x2x2x2x2… etc. The twos are all the same but the pedals are all different so each time you use one it’s not available in the next position.
Hence 96x95x94… etc.
Yeah, Mr duck is right. For every position on the board, you just check how many options you have. 96 for the first, 95 for the second etc.
2^96 = 79228162514264337593543950336 possible combinations…
This is how many combinations you can get by switching each pedal on/off AFTER you have chosen pedal positions from 96! possibilities.
NorthWood MediaWorks:… at least he’s no longer in diapers!
If he were it would be Nappy You Hear.
So the total possible ways of connecting and using the pedal board is 96!*2^96 which is 7.86 *10^178.
Not bad
So the total possible ways of connecting and using the pedal board is 96!*2^96 which is 7.86 *10^178.
Not bad
What about pedals with stereo outs
If all pedals have mono inputs and you are not allowed to merge signals, then it’ll be less