Hello, I am having a discussion with a colleague wether a key change should be preceded with a double barline yes or no.
In E. Gould she says double barline only when also a new musical section (otherwise single barline).
In Ted Ross from 1978 it shows the double barline as standard.
What would be the best for notating 18th century music?
The adverb in the Ross is key: ātraditionallyā. Itās a convention that gradually fell out of use. However, if youāre doing 18th century music, itās very much an editorial decision to modernize that aspect of the notation or not. I would keep it. Confront with the manuscript and contemporary sources of the material youāre working with.
If you want to change the automatically created double barline at a key change, select the double barline and either click on the ānormal barlineā button or enter ā|ā in the + popover.
your suggestion does not work
Because I can not select the double barline on its own.
The start repeat barline will be highlighted, too.
So if I then change the barline to a normal barline, the repeat barline will be lost
Itās not out of use yet, although thereās certainly been a shift towards single barline before key changes in recent decades.
Personally, I prefer the double barline as a visual aid before key changes in classical music which otherwise isnāt sprecifically sectionalised. Otherwise, in the relatively rare event of a key change in the middle of a specified section, I use single barlines to avoid any confusion with regard to the form.
In theatre stuff and my own writing, Iāve used thick barlines for structural cues for a long time. This leaves doubles for barlines with dialogue between etc. Thick double barlines are a useful āwatch out!ā marker.
This is an old thread. In Dorico Pro, you can now set your preference in Engraving Options > Barlines > Key Signatures, but you canāt access Engraving Options in Elements.