Mac Studio computer. Will it run Dorico normally?
Of course it will. Itās just two M1 Maxes stuck together.
I say ājustā, but this thing is insane: itās faster than a 28-core 2019 Mac Pro at less than a third of the price.
Even the āstandardā M1 Max config ($1999) is 1.5x faster than a 16-core Mac Pro ($7499).
You could run Dorico and do some 8K video editing at the same time.
Incidentally, it looks like Apple is killing the 27" iMac, in favour of the Studio Display and Mac combo. Displays tend to get replaced much less frequently than computers, so thatās a good thing.
I am probably going for the cheaper model, comes with 32 GB which should be enough for Dorico and Cubase running at the same time.
The last 3 years I worked on the 21" model with 8 GB, the Mac Studio will be a big upgrade!
I was so anxious about the Dorico update these days that I did not even know about those new Macs! That looks promising
Itāll barely notice that itās doing any work at all. If it was sentient, it would be bored.
I have my eye on the gorgeous new Studio Display. Trying to remind myself what I have is totally adequate, and I canāt afford it anywaysā¦ resistā¦
love this itās going to be another catchphrase for apple ultra configs haha
if you think about it though, some mac pro configs used a dual Xeon. I am guessing this is the direction Apple is aiming. A computer is also just a piece of plastic with some minerals stuck to it
Iāve just heard someone call it āTwo Mac Minis in a trench coatā, which I rather like.
I have the old Apple Thunderbolt Display, and Iāve been toying with replacing it for a higher-DPI screen ā but there arenāt many that also have (decent) camera, mic, speakers, and hub for other ports.
However, Iāve just splurged quite a lot on the MBP, so may have to hold off for a bit.
At the very least, the new Display may provoke other manufacturers to produce something similar, even if not quite as good for a bit less.
I will only buy the computer itself, and connect it to my Asus monitors. You can connect 5 monitors to it!
This is basically what Iāve been waiting for. I had toyed with the idea of the laptops, but since I need 64gb ram, I can come in $1200 cheaper with the new mini, which is a win in my book. Now to convince my wifeā¦ Iāve been prepping her for months. Fortunately, my computer has aged to the point that certain software literally cannot run on it, because I cannot upgrade to a sufficiently current OS. Our hand is forced, as it were.
I told her last night, āApple finally released the new mini and it has 64gb ram!ā [she knows my computing requirements] to which she very dryly responded, ācongratulations, apple.ā at which point she then turned on her heels and walked away.
Itās actually 4 Mac miniās if you think about it. All they did was create a base element that they could multiply and stack next to each other to increase its power. From a production- and economic aspect, this is quite smart and efficient.
In terms display, I donāt think I want to buy any of the cinema displays, simply for the sole reason that I donāt really need much color accuracy and DPI for just displaying tracks and mixer pages in Cubase.
I think one of Samsungs latest 4K QLED 50inch or even 43inch TVās connected via HDMI will do just fine. Specs-wise, they are no different than putting three-cost DELLās next to each otherā¦
In comparison, if you buy 3 cinema displays, it will set you back around 6000 EUR versus 600 for the Samsung displayā¦
A 50 inch 4K display is only 88 pixels per inch. My Thunderbolt display is 109ppi, and just on the cusp of acceptability for my eyes. High dpi displays are much crisper, clearer, and less tiring ā Yes, theyāre more expensive, but not equivalent value.
I have a 27" 4k monitor double-armās length away from me, and even at that resolution and size, I am aware that things arenāt perfectly crisp, although I canāt claim to spot individual pixelsā¦ but I know good and well that it is not as clear as my other devices with retina displays, and it bothers me. Every time I see a 27" 1080p monitor I shudder inside.
Yes that might be true for most TVās but it also depends on how far away you are from your display of course. The Samsung has better density.
My current displays have a pixel density of 92PPI (Dell U2414H) while the Samsung UE43AU7100 has 103ppi. So I was looking at what I have and what the specifications of that TV display would be and to me it looked reasonable enough. I cannot see the individual pixels from sitting an arms length away from the current DELLās so I suppose it will be fine with a Samsung QLED. I guess Iāll try it out and if it doesnāt work, I will go with some newer LED screens instead.
I had a 32" 4K monitor initially and foolishly went for a 43". It was insanely large for my desk, and the pixel density was (predictably) awful. I returned it immediately.
For the past two years Iāve used a Dell UltraSharp 27" 4K on a monitor arm. Iām much more pleased with it than anything else Iāve used. But I have pretty good eyesight, and full orchestra scores just arenāt sharp enough for my preference. Hopefully higher-resolution monitors continue to come down in price as technology continues to advance. Iād love that new 5K display, but itās just too pricey for me.
I am close to buying a new Studio Mac and, unfortunately, Apple has decided to force the user to chose the maximum RAM upon purchase. Therefore, my question is this: would the 32 gig RAM be enough for a full orchestral project in Dorico? More specifically, I want full playback of a symphonic orchestra, using the best orchestral sounds that Dorico has. The 64 gig RAM model is $400 more.
Iād spend the $400 to be sure and (somewhat) future-proof.
This is one area where I really despise apple, even though Iām a max user. Their markup for ram is criminal, frankly.
This is literally the only reason Iām the only one in my house on PC. Both my kids and wife are on Macs. Iām on iPhone and iPad. To upgrade from 64 to 128 gigs for a Mac Pro is an additional $720!!! For $295 I can buy 128 gigs for PC.