Quiet Arts Wave Rider 2. Unfortunately only available for Pro-Tools Mac currently. Sounds like it is smart enough to save hours of fine tuning level automation time (like for vox). In a comparison with Wave’s “Vocal Rider”, it rocked, per the review.
I’d love to try this on my vox tracks - the price seems reasonable ($129US) - can’t wait for it to be released for Cubase/PC!
Looks interesting. Is it really that hard to ride a vocal though using your ears? I think if it was, there would be a lot more plugins like this out there.
I don’t think I would ever use a plugin like this because I don’t want to lose my job LOL.
Hey, even a better topic (but not to hijack the thread) How does everyone set a vocal in the mix currently without using this plug or Waves’ Rider plugin?
To me that is a little more interesting, but hey, that’s just me. I’ll get me coat!
^^ You only mix in mono, twilightsong? And you hire that guy to do your vocal rides??
OT: What intrigues me about the writeup on the Quiet Arts WaveRider 2 (op) is the statement that it did a better job than not only the Wave “Vocal Rider” but (per the author) “…it virtually tracked my manual automation — except that it did it better, helping out a bit more in all the right places without me even modifying the default settings…”.
How can something be that good (making what I think is probably a reasonable assumption that the author is probably no slouch)? It sure sounds 2-good-2-B-tru, but he does show some images suggesting he wasn’t just blowing smoke.
I saw this post when I was out to dinner with my girlfriend. I couldn’t stop laughing. Then she wanted to know what I was laughing at and had to read her the thread and explain everything.
I saw this post when I was out to dinner with my girlfriend. I couldn’t stop laughing. Then she wanted to know what I was laughing at and had to read her the thread and explain everything.
She didn’t laugh >
The problem is probably that you shouldn’t be reading the forums while going out to dinner with her.
I have been wanting to do something similar with EQ for a long time but I’m too distracted with other nonsense to write a VSTfx. The thought was that you have a general idea of what distribution you want for the various frequencies so the VST would keep a moving average over 30 points and make adjustments to the frequency buckets (after FFT) so that the moving average stays in the general shape that the user specified.
Windows RTAS/AAX is about to be released. Testing as we speak. This is good news for other platforms on Windows cause we got the driver sorted, which was the drawback.