One of the changes from 8 to 9 which I noticed right away, was the top of the mixer window, the Filter Selection, shown here…
IMO the old graphic (v8) looked better, shown here
One of the changes from 8 to 9 which I noticed right away, was the top of the mixer window, the Filter Selection, shown here…
IMO the old graphic (v8) looked better, shown here
Looks like the orange rectangle is supposed to be under the icon so it illuminates orange.
It would’ve been better to report as a bug report instead of in Miscellaneous.
confirmed.
It doesn’t bug me, nor hinder my musical process but it is a cosmetic anomaly.,i also think that the color of the rectangle should also reflect the chosen group)
(i use this too rarely to care tbh:P )
Quite right. Would a Moderator kindly move this to Issues thread please.
thx
No. Read the stickies in the bugs forum please.
I’ll bite. I don’t entirely understand what rule applies here. Surely if one would add the following, it would be nothing more than a formality?
Some of my issue reports were hit by this too. If there is a visual gitch then all I can do is give you my specs and show it.
Consider the QA person who has to slog through 40 or 400 reports in a morning. This person should not have to do further troubleshooting to figure out the missing parts of a recipe, even if it seems trivial. Your repro wouldn’t expose the problem in a default Cubase installation because it does not include the step required to reveal it.
If someone reports this to tech support, the support rep will figure it out, and send a bug report to the QA folks.
Oh, that’s right, I missed making a filter selection in those steps. I guess in a case like this it’s just complicated enough to warrant the steps.
Is this Tech Support a better way than using the forums then?