Tweaking settings UV22 Crashes batch mode

EDITED POST

Wavelab 9.5.50 (build 208) bug, not on previous version downloaded around september last year) I tested it before updating this morning

  • FIRST CONFIGURATION : High Sierra on a Octocore MacPro5,1 with 32GB Ram & ATI Radeon HD 4870
  • SECOND CONFIGURATION : Mojave 10.14.5 on 3,5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5 32Gb Ram (early 2013 cylinder) with AMD FirePro D500 3 Go

This workflow reproduces bug every time

  • Create New Batch single or multicore
  • Custom plugin chain : instantiate UV22. It defaults to 16 bit, I change it to 24 bit
  • Closing the UV22 windows => Wavelab quits suddenly and the mac issues a crash report (BEGINNING PASTED BELOW)
    Best regards
    Mark Haliday
    CUSTOM STUDIO

ON FIRST CONFIGURATION :
Process: WaveLab Pro 9.5 [5304]
Path: /Applications/WaveLab Pro 9.5.app/Contents/MacOS/WaveLab Pro 9.5
Identifier: net.steinberg.WaveLab-Pro-9-5
Version: 9.5.50.208 (9.5.50.208)
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: ??? [1]
Responsible: WaveLab Pro 9.5 [5304]
User ID: 501

Date/Time: 2019-06-15 18:09:40.222 +0200
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.13.6 (17G65)
Report Version: 12
Anonymous UUID: 17F4546B-1294-29C4-8A03-2AB8ABD345A2

Sleep/Wake UUID: 1F9D4E2E-344A-4A08-ABB8-137526FE8702

Time Awake Since Boot: 17000 seconds
Time Since Wake: 4000 seconds

System Integrity Protection: enabled

Crashed Thread: 0 Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread

Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0000000000000018
Exception Note: EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY

Termination Signal: Segmentation fault: 11
Termination Reason: Namespace SIGNAL, Code 0xb
Terminating Process: exc handler [0]

VM Regions Near 0x18:

__TEXT 000000010cd38000-000000010f02f000 [ 35.0M] r-x/rwx SM=COW /Applications/WaveLab Pro 9.5.app/Contents/MacOS/WaveLab Pro 9.5

Application Specific Information:
objc_msgSend() selector name: isKindOfClass:

Try to use a single task in the batch processor options.

Hi,
Thanks for your answer, I tried the “One Core Empty” option if this what you mean and it did the same

I am surprised that there isn’t anymore the simple solution of processing a batch through the master section as it used to be possible in the past.

The current option of “associated master section preset” is unclear in the manual

See edit of my first message

I am surprised that there isn’t anymore the simple solution of processing a batch through the master section as it used to be possible in the past.

Not sure what you mean, as there is:
2019-06-18_23-24-44.png
And I don’t think a feature was removed.