Two articles from the same site.
Can’t vouch for the veracity of either.
Bullsquirt and lunatic delusion. Me or them? Who cares.
Wishing more and more that I’d kept my Atari.
Merry Christmas.
This broke a whole bunch of my multi-monitor Cubase Workspaces which depended on the taskbar being on the left side of the left most monitor.
MS corporate policy seems to value making stuff more cumbersome to actually use.
You’d probably scream after the warm feeling of nostalgia has lifted its comforting veil and you are left with an agonizingly slow system…
We are all spoiled - very much so 
I don’t have enough expertise to comment on the second article. The fixed taskbar is indeed an annoyance if you need it to be elsewhere.
However, do these articles really keep you from getting out of the bed… ? Nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more.
Have a lovely Christmas, @Googly_Shakespeare 
You, too.
Don’t forget - pace yourself!
So they want to basically rewrite an OS with a codebase that goes back more than three decades with a new language in 4 years?
And at the same time, they were not able to bring the new taskbar to feature parity with the old one in the same amount of time (4 years since Windows 11 got released), because placing the taskbar on the side or top is “too complex”?
Lol?
PS:
one of the distinguished engineers at Microsoft is actually quite confident about the company’s plans, all thanks to “AI.”
Considering how bad Copilot is and how much the quality of MS software has deteriorated recently - coinciding with their alleged use of AI in coding - this makes me even less confident. But we’ll see. I’ve been wrong before
1 Like