I just don’t think this is the best way to go about it. Let me give you a very simple example:
If I’m trying to sell a production on using Nuendo and I have to interact with another engineer - and assuming they would be willing to adapt and use Nuendo instead of Pro Tools - I would still have a problem convincing them if some basic functions in Nuendo just aren’t up to par with Pro Tools.
Glide automation is one example. Trim automation is another. VCA a third. Plus some of what Tada wrote down.
It is far better to just “steal” whatever it is the competition is doing when the competition is clearly doing it better, rather than just ignore that. And at this point Steinberg is pretty much ignoring fixing some pretty basic stuff - or their priorities are a bit odd. Granted, there were some really great additions to Cubase 14 that many users wanted, but some of the stuff that’s relating to automation still being f-ed up!?
Going between DAWs doesn’t solve that.