Hi,
I haven’t found an answer to this despite extensive searching, and can’t believe Cubase would have this oversight!
When recording, and there is a slip I need to remember for later, is there a command I can use to add an edit to the recording, without having to press stop recording / start recording?
The result would be a new take without any gap between. This is easily doable on audacity, protools and logic so can’t believe there isn’t a command on cubase!
The use is in recording a podcast. I want the file to be split to speed up the editing process - in edting I can easily find all the cuts and edit from there.
Markers don’t make cuts so aren’t as efficient.
It’s the equivalent of hitting ** [record record] but I don’t want any gaps - I’m often simul recording remotely and I don’t want it to get out of sync later on
What about to make a Macro of 2 Record Enable presses? One would disable and second would enable the record of the given track? Would there be a gap? Or a Macro of pressing the Record button twice.
I’m not aware of a direct feature like this in Cubase.
You could (I think without checking) create a Project Logical Editor to Split the Audio at the Markers.
You’re never going to get it to create a new file without the Transport stopping at least for a few moments to create the new file.
If you are adamant about not using Markers (which seems like the easiest approach to me) then Martin’s suggestion is worth a try, make sure the cursor isn’t set to return to the start upon stopping playback.
I am curious to try this. What’s the command called in Audacity?
Edit: Is this a well-hidden command? I’m familiar with Audacity, but could not find this in the menus, including the Extras menu.
The obvious command would be Split, which is greyed out during recording.
This Macro can do the basic task but not reliably. I think it’s a timing thing and some ‘pauses’ should be added to slow it down. If I execute these 2 commands manually (aka slow human speed) it always works.
Actually it’s not easily doable on Audacity after all - I was going by another podcaster I know who said this is what he did, but it was actually a start-stop after all!
That’s what I thought. I imagine it’s not possible in any daw, because realtime functions cannot allow for such things.
Martin’s suggestion is a good solution here, it will be the smallest possible gap, but as the experienced professionals in this topic have pointed out, markers are for this exact purpose.
I think there might always be a gap of some length. But at what point can it be heard? I’d guess there would be a bit more slack for spoken word than music.