Thank you for your response, which is very realistic. But I did not say that cubase is weak and useless, and I did not say that cubase should be like others.
I am talking about competition and new innovation. Improving workflow, improving performance, fixing alot of problems, completing the many deficiencies and requests for users. supports re manage and organize old things .
I want Make menus and buttons coordinate
Even the Excel program is improving alot and developing dramatically.
to understand what I mean well, Iām a fan of cubase and I donāt want it to look like any bitwig or others. I would like to see my favorite program in the best condition, always free from many problems and its performance is better and better.
I have a computer with very high specifications and every time I face Problems with cubase only, while Studio One is a program that I did not buy. I bought some devices and came with it gift and I did not have any problems with it, although I do not like it i still use cubase s. If I want cubase look like bitwig why am I sticking to it and write here now.?
If i like bitwig i will switch to bitwig
but that not my point.
your opinion is appreciatedā¦
but you are saying " steinberg Developers should not evolve and improve "
and we are all impressed with all these problems. And we dont want extra features and stability.
-I changed my 4k screen because the developers did no support full hidpi the scale is very bad .
-There is no good compatibility between Dorico and Cubase.
-I record live and I can only control 4 CUES
Studio one = unlimited CUES
-The huge sessions in cubase Many crashes and high cpu usageā¦
while Studio One does not face any problem.
Again your opinion I respect it, but please speak more realistically,
even hardware devices do not Compared to Presonus and Avid
look at protools carboon alot of dsp power inside this deviceā¦
Thank u