Not to be facetious but wouldn’t you be better served spending your money on a computer upgrade to get with the times rather than on an update from Cubase PRO 8.5 to 9?
My Mac Pro can run 64bit Cubase just fine. The issue is I have certain plugins that have ceased development that I rely on that are 32bit only. It’s a pain, but workable with Cubase 8.5 with it’s bridge that supports 32bit plugins.
My issue is that had I known that Cubase 9 had dropped support for 32bit plugins, then I would not have purchased it. While I completely understand the move to 64bit only, I feel conned by Steinberg who have now taken my money for an upgrade that is useless to me. They should have clearly stated that Cubase 9 was dropping support for 32 bit plugins somewhere that was visible before purchase.
I do understand the problem of losing 32 bit plugs that are no longer being developed. I am preparing for workarounds for my “vintage” plugins… and am waiting for the trial v9.
What 32bit plugins are so good as to foresake the great features of version 9??
(I still have my 8.5, as it was not uninstalled during the upgrade and would love to try them !!)
Thats the issue. They should have POSTED the 64 bit only in big black letters with exclamation points under the Cubase info AND in the purchase screen as well.
First short impression is very good,- plugins are shown in Cubase as normal 64 bit plugs, you can’t see any resurrected/ conversation issues, old projects opened also with all 32 plugins who is used there fine, I will spend more time on weekend in action, and will be back here.
My converted/working list is : URS , Sylenth, Vanguard, some Antares Harmony plugs, Oxford, Altiverb 6.