Here are a few bales worth:
It should be patently obvious by now that recorded music has no intrinsic worth and that the only way to recoup is by charging massive door prices for concerts and paraphernalia.
…
Come what may, we can be sure that at some point the US will determine all works public domain if there is some reasonable (non-commercial) purpose because the media industry should not have a monopoly on ideas
…
These “crimes” are good because they keep the system running, like funding from states to manage schools, hospitals etc it’s all about oiling the wheels of democracy.
What I find interesting about the “sharing” issue is how many people who may have originaly cut their teeth on the rebellious origins of rock and roll now are openly willing to hate on their neighbors for listening to music. According to the copyright diehardists, everyone will have to contribute a few pence for even going to their friends house and listening to music. Its obvious that the revolutionary heart of rock and roll has at least in part been subsumed by the very same conservative fetishes of property/money/corporatism/class/war that rock and roll originaly took a stand against. There are some good lessons to be learned: Mainly, just because a person plays guitar doesn’t mean they’re cool. The Brianjonestown Massacre has a little fanclub anyone can join - “The Committee To Keep Music Evil”.
Fundamentalist forces want music creation and listening to be a crime, where else has such doctrine been the law?
…
Attempting to forbid music (art,books,information,scripture,songs of freedom,political opinion), limit it for certain, paying classes, (practices in 1500 called ‘indulgences’; the rich pay for heaven) is the heritage we receive straight from witch hunts, book burning, McCarthyism. That this issue is modernized and spun to make it look like the artists are being ripped off, boohoo, is how the modern misinformation war is implemented and the truth turned turned turned on its head. The artist has always been ripped off by the very ‘copyright’ owner class which seeks to play the victim now. All empires and dominating forces become more reationary and repressive as they reap their own demise.
…
And when a person defends the accused witch/artist/writer/healer from persecution and scapegoating, even in theoretical curiosity and socratic method, the defenders are labeled a heretic too. But this only says something about the narrow spectrum of ethical awareness the accusers live by; as if only in receiving reward can a person possibly have interest and empathy.
Straw, and crap. Not that straw and crap are without use. European pioneers on the American frontier would take buffalo dung, mix it with straw, form it into blocks, let it dry in the sun and use the adobe to build primitive mud huts to live in. The indigenous peoples, called “primitives” by the Europeans, had more elegant solutions for their shelters. Ironic, isn’t it?