As we have been informed, the server will be shut down by the 20th of May 2025. (Out of service on the 21 th or the 20th already?)
I want to know how to preserve the Steinberg offered Grace Period that is attached to eLicensers-Licenses if updated at any time in the future. (If one has bought the updates but has not updated yet or has still new unused eLicenser-licenses (in sealed boxes).) In both cases … before the 20th of May 2025 and thereafter and in both cases, owning the update codes for the old eLicenser based system or the new codes for the new Steinberg Licensing system that are nowadays sold.
(4 use-cases … old activation keys – update an exiting version and a new License (2) and the same with the keys that are for the new Steinberg Licensing system (2))
Are we forced to loose this valuable asset (Grace Period) because we have to update until the 20th of May 2025? I hope / I expect not.
As an owner of still unused eLicenser-license keys I ask myself:
Do I “only” have NOT to activate it IN the new Steinberg Licensing system after I am now forced to input the eLicenser codes in the eLicenser Control Center software? And only activate it at some distant point in the future when needed (and get the THEN current version) and hope not to activate it by accident if not needed yet?
So: Will this be a two-step process? First, I will get the latest eLiceners-Version on the eLicenser after I entered the activation key in the eLicenser Control Center. Then I stop and press the activate button in the new Steinberg Licensing software at some distant point in the future and get the then latest version?
(Example: If I now update from WaveLab 9 to WaveLab 9.5 I imagine to get the license of WaveLab 11 on the eLicenser and in the new Steinberg Licensing system I see an entry for WaveLab 12, that I do not shall activate in case I do choose only to work still with the eLicenser based WaveLab 11 (10,9,8 …) versions. And when WaveLab 13 or 14 is out, I activate the pending WaveLab 12 activation button and get the WaveLab 13 or 14 thank’s to the grace period?)
Same procedure with Dorico, Cubase, Nuendo, Absolute, … for people that have not yet redeemed activation keys.
How to preserve this not activated status (WITH an attached Grace-Period) in case I wish to give this status (old licence + the attached grace-period (license-activation due to an update or a new license)) to someone else?
Until now I could give the eLicenser-license and the code for the update (or the code for the new license) to someone else and he could decide for himself WHEN to use it at a time of her/his choosing.
Could Steinberg please give detailed step by step instruction how to handle this, that one not slips accidently and loses the Grace Period for software, she/he (the new owner) did not wishes to active YET? (Now use cases as a give-to-others version with the attached Grace-Period in mind.)
What to do with new unused eLicensers (bought before the announcement of the new licensing system). Do one loses the so far attached value to them too as they are after the 20th of May 2025 useless as a licensing system if empty? (Some folks may enjoy the pulsing dim red light if connected on a free USB-port. But for that it was too expensive in my opinion.)
How do shops that sell / offer eLicensers handle this? Can they give them back and will they get a refund? (I bought mine shortly before Steinberg announced publically the new system. It’s quite a lot of money if you had bought not only one but bought in mind to have enough to store all the licenses that are still packed on one eLicenser separately to be free in your configuration and the handling in the give-to-someone-else cases.)
Why is switching of a quietly working eLicensers server even necessary? I mean in times of virtualisation on servers and ever faster and / or energy efficient hardware over time. Was there a security breach or is this only to save energy costs? Or what may be behind this? I, as a customer do not see a necessity for this switching off.
Letting it run would spare us so much hassle and headache. I assume, over the time it would become frequented less and less and could therefore reside in memory of a server as a virtual machine. (Denial of service attacks may be a problem but not the Steinberg users with old systems.)
Thank you in advance for clarifying all of this.