Hi Jochen,
Thanks for letting me know - I will wait patiently 
Pauly
1 Like
Hi Again,
With great hope I installed 12.0.30.
I can report itās not fixed in 12:0.30
Pauly
Can you use the MAckie control protocol??
HI @Pablin_Drummer
Yes that works however ultra-limited by only 8 channels accessible at a time, and the multi layered approach that forces. I find it unworkable.
To have 16 physical faders with pan and mute buttons available on the console, in sync with Cubase will be a game changer for my mixing and make it a much more pleasurable (and spontaneous/musical) experience.
Joel has said itāll be fixed so Iām so looking forward to doing my first mix with the console!
Thanks
Pauly
but if you have more faders, it doesnāt recognize them by banks of 8? as if they were independent? that is, you would have to add another mackie control and put the 2 bank of faders. Iād have to see the manual to confirm.
for example, with the old tascam it was done like this.
Maybe this video helps you
Hi Pablin,
Thanks but thatās not a solution for me. Im looking forward to having more than 8 faders available when mixing.
Thanks
Pauly
Hi Jochen,
Has there been any progress on this issue? I see itās still not resolved in .40
Thanks
Pauly
Hi @Pauly,
As there is a solution for motorized faders (the āgood oldā Mackie Control integration) please stick to that for now.
Thanks
Jochen
Hi Jochen,
Bummer. Thanks though for the reply.
1 Like
Hi All
I have the same issue with a Allen and Heath SQ7.
The faders resist any movement when set up in midi remote.
I also find that buttons such as mute work only every third press.
The annoying thing is the SQmixpad on my iPad works perfectly. So it can be achieved !
Cheers
1 Like
It would be such a WIN for Cubase to fix this!
Unfortunately not working with 12.0.50 either 
1 Like
What a pain! I wish they would fix this. Would revolutionise my mixing sessions!
Pauly
2 Likes
Hi Jochen,
I hope you had a great Chrissy and New Yearā¦Now here we are, back at work :-(.
I just want to reinforce that the Mackie integration is not really a solution for me as it gives me 8 faders only which (even with banks) is not for me.
Would love to have proper motorised fade support!
Not hassling - just reminding Iām sure Iām not alone. Thereāll be a bunch of Midas and X32 users hoping and waiting.
Thanks
Hi Paulyā¦ just working through basic setup with my QU16ā¦ Havenāt dug deep yet, but getting the same issue for a generic audio channel on the qu16 (sends high resolution fader values)ā¦ I can get āMidiā mode to work on a custom layer; but thatās 7bit midi only (0-127)ā¦ not ideal for e.g. an audio faderā¦ or at leastā¦ since I have a high res controlerā¦ might as well try and use it that way!..
Are you familiar with Bome MIDI Translator? Iām about an hour into trying to setup the QU16 for C12 and probably going to jump into BOME and see if I can set something up there. Itās pretty nerdy stuff thoughā¦ but Iām fairly confident I can get my QU16 working the way I want.
As for the fader stuck issueā¦ My guess is that the physical fader sends a value and the C12 fader sends the latest āsoftware fader movementā value back to the unitā¦ but if the fader has moved past that point, itās told to āgo back a few valuesā by the software faderā¦ e.g. itās not responding to touch which would deactivate the ārecieve messagesā until released. Itās then basically getting stuck try to move the fader and send the fader values at the same time.
Iām going to try mapping a QU fader to BOME and then try to fake a fader-touch command by coding in āif fader has sent a value, ignore recieving messages until 0.1 seconds after the value is sentā. If that works, then Iāll just jump in and map the whole unit to BOMEā¦ problem solved (hopefully!)ā¦
If youāre not at all nerdy, BOME probably isnāt for youā¦ but if you have the will to learn a few basic commands, or if you already know BOME, then it could be a good solution.
I feel like waiting on these things is painfulā¦ big companies have a lot of things to run around and do; and sometimes itās easier and less heart breaking to just āroll your ownā 
1 Like
Can only hardly agreeā¦ BOME is a really, really nice and cool software. The support is outstanding and Florian is a very nice guy.
ā¦ Trueā¦ just suggesting that it may not be an easy headspace for e.g. an old rocker whoās no good with computers ;)ā¦
Anyway - a quick update on the BOME setup:
Iāve completely solved the fader echo issue!!.. But Iām not sure the final product is quite what Iām after lolā¦
Itās NOT a 100% āfader touchā solutionā¦ not sure I can actually do that as itās possibly a hardware limitation?
I have it setup so that when I move a fader on the QU, that same fader doesnāt recieve any data from cubase until I stop moving the hardware faderā¦ I have it set to 1 second after I let goā¦ seems to give me enough time to remove my hand from it if thereās automation sending continuous data (i.e. if I set it to āzeroā, then my hand would still be on the fader when automation is running in the background, and Iād be crunching the motor again)ā¦
What I canāt do is easily interupt existing automation moving the faderā¦ It seems like I may struggle here to be honest. If the QU is already recieving fader movements from cubase, then itās hard to interupt that by physically moving a fader without crunching the motorā¦ Iāll keep digging; but itās hurting my brain trying to figure out how to avoid that!
In the meantime; at least I can move a fader and have it control a channel without the echo / feedback; and at least I can have the faders move in response to cubase automationā¦ a good start
Okā¦ yeahā¦ I guess Iām stuck with a hardware limitation here.
QU faders arenāt touch sensitive, so when I recieve automation Iāll always need to fight the controller.
Out of interest; does this mean that the overarching issue discussed here (midi echo fighting fader movements) is NOT present in touch sensitive controllers?? e.g. X-Touch doesnāt have this issue to start with??
In the meantimeā¦
I donāt do a lot of volume automationā¦ I just want hands on control of faders for static levels for tracking and mixdowns. I think I can manage with what Iāve setup for nowā¦
If I do decide I want hand-on fader access to heavily automated tracks, I guess Iāll need to setup a toggle on my QU to simluate touchā¦ Might set the PAFL button to toggle a disengage ārecieve midi from cubaseā so I can write automation without fighting fadersā¦ something like that
Peas