As others have said, no there’s no magic sauce in the M1/M2 processor like Apple likes to pretend. They are just ARM CPUs. Good ARM CPUs, but that’s all. ARM hasn’t discovered a magic cheat code that lets them be better than everyone else. In general there’s a “how much power something draws vs how much it performs,” tradeoff and it is non-linear.
If you want to switch to a Mac, do it because you want the Mac experience that being their OS, their design, their hardware-software integration. Don’t do it because of performance claims, Apple has always made big performance claims for as long as I’ve followed them and they’ve never been realistic. For those keeping track this is their 3rd architecture switch (they started on 68k, then PPC, then x86, now ARM) and each time they claimed how amazing the improvement was and how their computers were the fastest in the world and so on.
Also make sure you are ok with the tradeoffs namely that they will change how things are done at a moments notice and you simply have to accept that, they have a short support cycle (an OS is only supported for about 2 versions back, usually 3 years, as opposed to MS or most Linuxes that are 10 years), and tend to be very much a “you get what you get, and once you buy it there’s no upgrades” sort of company.
All that aside, unless you are working on extremely high end projects, in which case you may want to look at a multi-CPU server or workstation, CPUs are so fast these days you needn’t worry much. They will all be plenty fast enough; Intel vs AMD vs ARM just doesn’t matter they can all do what you need no problem.
So if you like Apple’s offerings for some reason other than the CPU, like you really like MacOS, then it could be worth looking at. However, if it is just a FOMO thing about the CPU don’t worry. All the CPUs are fine these days. Technically Intel has faster CPUs for their desktop parts because they choose to push them harder. The high-end 13th generation chips pull a lot of power, and as such can get really high clocks. It makes them much less efficient per-watt (they can be quite efficient per watt if you set them to back off on the clocks) but that is the tradeoff that they decided was desirable for high end desktops.
That could all change at any time, a new AMD CPU could come out that trounces Intel, or a new M series CPU that does the same. However none of it will be a big deal as those other CPUs will all still be good and do their job perfectly well and usually when people talk about a new one “trouncing” existing ones it is usually more like a 10% performance uplift. Not nothing, but not so much you’d actually care.
As a final example I do fairly small stuff in Nuendo, only maybe 10-20 tracks and I upgraded from a 8700k to a 13900k a number of months ago. I notice no difference in Nuendo. It’s fun and all, the CPU usage meter is lower, but I was having no issues with the 8700k. Despite it being a massive, like 4x, power jump I already had no issues so it didn’t change anything.
For a lot of audio uses, what we have CPU wise is already plenty good.
) holding the mouse and keyboard… 
